Howard Kaikow wrote:
> The so called protection policies are no guarantee.
> ...
> The BEST protection is to use a good UPS to REDUCE the chance of a problem
> and BACKUP at least once per day.

How does a UPS that does not even claim to address such problems
become best protection?    Posted previously are numerous technical
reasons why that plug-in UPS provides no effective solution.  Why claim
this UPS will reduce problems it does not even claim to solve?

Effective hardware protection was provided.  Another essential part
of data protection is using NTFS files system on that disk - not use a
repeatedly obsoleted FATxx file system.

Plug-in UPS provides protection to unsaved data.   A plug-in UPS does
nothing effective for hardware and backup system protection.   Why
claim a UPS does things even its manufacturer does not claim?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]