On 6 Mar 2006 22:01:42 -0800, "w_tom" <w_tom1@usa.net> wrote:

>Howard Kaikow wrote: 
>
>  How does a UPS that does not even claim to address such problems
>become best protection?

Because they do make such claims

> Posted previously are numerous technical
>reasons why that plug-in UPS provides no effective solution.  Why claim

You only think your pontification is technical because you are a
blowhard.

>this UPS will reduce problems it does not even claim to solve?

Still can't fathom where you got that from.

>  Effective hardware protection was provided.  Another essential part
>of data protection is using NTFS files system on that disk - not use a
>repeatedly obsoleted FATxx file system.

Utterly clueless.

>  Plug-in UPS provides protection to unsaved data.   A plug-in UPS does
>nothing effective for hardware and backup system protection.   Why

Wrong.  Think "Line Conditioning"

>claim a UPS does things even its manufacturer does not claim?

They certainly do make these claims.  Even if it is false or
misleading advertising you're still left out in the cold.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]