03-16-06 10:51 PM
You need to create local group, and then add your domain group to it
- Biztalk Application Users
- Biztalk Isolated Host Users
- Biztalk Server Administrators
- SSO Administrators
ex. "Biztalk Server Administrators" local group add your domain group
"POLYEMAILDEV1\BizTalk Server Administrators"
"Vijay" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to install BizTalk 2004 on my Virtual PC. Here's the
> onfiguration of my VPC whick I have setup as a DC.
>
> 1. Windows 2003 ENT Edition Service Pack 1
> 2. SQL Server 2000 Service pack 4
> 3. Computer name is poly2k3dev1
> 4. Domain name is POLYEMAILDEV1
>
> I created all the users and groups as mentioned in the doc. The
> type of the groups created for all the BT groups is "Security Group - Gloc
al".
>
> When I start my installation of Biztalk 2004, all the groups get mapped
> correctly to the Biztalk excepted group name. I do not get an excalmation
> mark to remap to a correct group. That is how I know all the groups have b
een
> mapped correctly. I also verified the log and saw the following
> "POLYEMAILDEV1\BizTalk Application Users is a valid domain group" for all
the
> groups that I predefined before installation.
>
> Just to ensure the installation completes, I also added the groups
> "POLYEMAILDEV1\BizTalk BAS Administrators" and "POLYEMAILDEV1\BizTalk Serv
er
> Administrators" group to SQL Server login as System Adminstrators. Note, m
y
> domain is POLYEMAILDEV1.
>
> I keep getting the following error and does not lallow me to complete the
> installation.
>
> Failed to create SQL login for BizTalk Administrators Group on database
> server "POLY2K3DEV1\POLY2K3DEVSQL2K1".
> Windows NT user or group 'POLY2K3DEV1\BizTalk Server Administrators' not
> found. Check the name again.
>
> Why does the install look for group "'POLY2K3DEV1\BizTalk Server
> Administrators" instead of 'POLYEMAILDEV1\BizTalk Server Administrators'.
The
> group 'POLYEMAILDEV1\BizTalk Server Administrators' is defined and has use
rs
> in the group and the uers.
>
> Any help with issue the above is appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
> Vijay
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|