-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
consistent 'from' nickname and domain.

If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
message in the format

To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.

for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.

You must code 3-digits or the nickname and domain that are used will be
random.

Several variations, including multiple newsgroups, are available; send an
email to remailer@eelbash.org, with a subject of: remailer-help for the
details.



*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

 iD8DBQFEJaruEC+g9Qawm6QRAtk9AKDF2j5Tkbb6
toPjhNfJM6qY/sGnUACg0qJR
2aBLcRwhL70SFQpNyXEjH9g=
=Xfkk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Oh, what's wrong, poor retarded child eelbash? Is ums not getting enough
traffic? Have too many people caught onto your silly little games of
gathering anonymous users info for god knows what reason?  Too many people
who choose not to wind up in the eelbash database?



On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
>consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
>
>If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
>message in the format
>
>	To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
>
>for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
>nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.
>
>You must code 3-digits or the nickname and domain that are used will be
>random.
>
>Several variations, including multiple newsgroups, are available; send an
>email to remailer@eelbash.org, with a subject of: remailer-help for the
>details.
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <pan.2006.03.25.20.42.29.232996@eelbash.org>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
> consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
>
> If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
> message in the format
>
> 	To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
>
> for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
> nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.
>
> You must code 3-digits or the nickname and domain that are used will be
> random.

So, I use some weird syntax to get a from nickname of _your_ choosing.
Then I get your 'civil' content filters applied to my message, which
means my message may or may not get accepted depending on your mood.
Then my message, if accepted as a civil message, gets forwarded to a
real mail2news server.

Alternatively, I could just send to that real mail2news server in the
first place, cutting out your censoring middleman. Difficult choice...

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
> consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
>
> If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
> message in the format
>
> 	To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
>
> for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
> nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.

Wow, that's just so much easier than putting a name in the From header
and sending to a normal mail2news. Not.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Helen Scarth wrote:


> The newsanon utility has changed

Well now there's a real shock.....

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:20:56 -0700, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
 
>
> Wow, that's just so much easier than putting a name in the From header and
> sending to a normal mail2news. Not.

Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
little fun and maybe also some serious remail.

And I dont forget to thank ALL remailer oprators for there work
making us to have the anonymous emails that we want.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
> working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
> fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
> remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
> make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
> Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
> little fun and maybe also some serious remail.

Eelbash, let me be the first to congratulate you on the birth of your
new sock puppet. I'm sure you and your new imaginary persona will be
very happy together.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
> working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
> fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
> remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
> make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.

What an entirely convincing personality. Nobody will ever guess it's
you! *yawn*

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 25 Mar 2006, Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:20:56 -0700, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> 
>
>Its not bad.

Yes, it IS bad. See below.    |
|
|
\|/

[vbcol=seagreen]
>In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Eelbash Admin
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header>
>wrote:
> 

In addition to this arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the
delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant, bald-faced
LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If
you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and
filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about
are:

eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
> little fun and maybe also some serious remail.

People in China, people who need to whistleblow, people who are hiding
from abusive spouses, they don't get to use remailers for 'fun'.

-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]