04-20-06 11:56 PM
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...237
5162 ]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-607:
---------------------------------------------
That's good news !
Regarding 0.9.2 problems, we do'nt have any solution but a migration to 1.0-
RC1.
0.9.x are supposed to be dead branches. We *won't * fix them, because 0.9.3
contains many fixes to 0.9.2, and 1.0-RC1 contains many fixes to 0.9.3. 1.0-
RCx are supposed to be bug fixes, and as soon as we haven't reached a stable
build (i.e., 1.0), the las
t version is *always* the best version.
As soon as 1.0 is released, then we will be able to maintain it. However, it
will always be the same story : 1.0.1 will be a bug fix, and it will be the
version to use if you were using 1.0.
So, the best advise I can give is to switch urgently to 1.0-RC1, and stop te
sting 0.9.x versions, which are severly bugged
FYI, 1.0-RC2 is on its way, and will be available soon (2 weeks ?)
> Geronimo unit test hangs while running Apache DS on BEA VM
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-607
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-607
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Type: Bug
> Versions: 1.0-RC1, pre-1.0
> Environment: CPU 3Ghz Pentium 4, 2 GB RAM, Win XP professional SP 2
> Reporter: Alexei Zakharov
> Attachments: MyApacheDS10Test.java, MyApacheDSTest.java, bea142.log, bea1
42_08.log, bea15.log
>
> This bug is the result of the investigation performed on Geronimo unit test failur
e on BEA VMs. Geronimo uses Apache DS for its internal needs. And one of the unit t
ests on Geronimo's "directory" module hangs on BEA VM due the strange behaviour of A
pac
heDS on BEA VMs. See the attached testcases. To simplify things all Geronimo
stuff was removed from the code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|