Hi All,

I'm using BTS 2006 Beta 2 (I htink - definitely beta something).

I have an orchestration that processes a multiline file.


From that file I extract jobs, statuses and meters.

Basically, the process is as follows.

Receive
Map
Send Job
Map
Send Status
Map
Send Meters

I have what appears to be a random situation where sometimes I get the the
job in the database, but the status does not get added, or I get the job and
the status, but no meter records.

I have ruled out data by checking the input files to confirm they are correc
t.

I get no messages in the event viewer to say that anything has gone wrong.

No orechestrations appear to be suspended or left running.

It's as though the orchestraion just stops in the middle of processing and
disappears.

Obviously, this is not ideal.

Anybody had any similar experiences?

TIA
Steve

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi,

You can use the HAT tool to step through how your orchestration excuted. Run
Health and Activity tracking from the BizTalk 2006 menu, in the queries,
select "Most recent 100 sercive instances", right click your orchestration i
n
the results view, and select Orchestration Debugger. You should then be able
to step throgh the flow shape by shape to see what happened.

Hope this helps,

Regards,

Alan


--
The Bloggers Guide to BizTalk
http://geekswithblogs.com/asmith



"SteveM" wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'm using BTS 2006 Beta 2 (I htink - definitely beta something).
>
> I have an orchestration that processes a multiline file.
>
>
> From that file I extract jobs, statuses and meters.
>
> Basically, the process is as follows.
>
> Receive
> Map
> Send Job
> Map
> Send Status
> Map
> Send Meters
>
> I have what appears to be a random situation where sometimes I get the the
> job in the database, but the status does not get added, or I get the job a
nd
> the status, but no meter records.
>
> I have ruled out data by checking the input files to confirm they are corr
ect.
>
> I get no messages in the event viewer to say that anything has gone wrong.
>
> No orechestrations appear to be suspended or left running.
>
> It's as though the orchestraion just stops in the middle of processing and
> disappears.
>
> Obviously, this is not ideal.
>
> Anybody had any similar experiences?
>
> TIA
> Steve

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In the orchestration, make sure that delivery confirmation is set to true.
Eric
http://stottcreations.com/blog

"SteveM" <SteveM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AA0E513F-390A-44EA-A0FA-72CB54109B7A@microsoft.com...
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using BTS 2006 Beta 2 (I htink - definitely beta something).
>
> I have an orchestration that processes a multiline file.
>
>
> From that file I extract jobs, statuses and meters.
>
> Basically, the process is as follows.
>
> Receive
> Map
> Send Job
> Map
> Send Status
> Map
> Send Meters
>
> I have what appears to be a random situation where sometimes I get the the
> job in the database, but the status does not get added, or I get the job
> and
> the status, but no meter records.
>
> I have ruled out data by checking the input files to confirm they are
> correct.
>
> I get no messages in the event viewer to say that anything has gone wrong.
>
> No orechestrations appear to be suspended or left running.
>
> It's as though the orchestraion just stops in the middle of processing and
> disappears.
>
> Obviously, this is not ideal.
>
> Anybody had any similar experiences?
>
> TIA
> Steve

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Good idea, but whenever I use HAT to connect to an orchestration it dies!

I am just assuming this is something to do with Beta2 - at least I hope so.

Cheers

"Alan Smith" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You can use the HAT tool to step through how your orchestration excuted. R
un
> Health and Activity tracking from the BizTalk 2006 menu, in the queries,
> select "Most recent 100 sercive instances", right click your orchestration
 in
> the results view, and select Orchestration Debugger. You should then be ab
le
> to step throgh the flow shape by shape to see what happened.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Regards,
>
> Alan
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]