05-25-06 12:14 PM
Sumitra,
I have installed BTS 2004, and following two Performance objects
(BizTalk:TDDS,
BizTalk:Messaging) are visible in Perfmon.exe. Following two services are
also started
"BizTalk Base EDI service" and "BizTalk Service BizTalk Group :
BizTalkServerApplication" apart from this
is there any services for BTS 2004. After starting the services I can see
only two objects which is listed above.
I believes that there is more than two Performance objects in BTS 2004
Please help me out..
Thanks
Manu
"Sumitra Sujanani [MSFT]" <sumitras@online.microsoft.com> wrote in messa
ge
news:lB4%23Ju3fGHA.3960@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Manu,
>
> Is your question based on a list of perf counter objects which are
> installed by BTS 2006? Could you clarify whether you have installed BTS
> 2004 or 2006 - some of the performance counter objects you have listed are
> new in BTS 2006 and so won't appear if you have BTS 2004.
>
> If you have installed BTS 2006, then some of these counter objects are
> created when the BTSNT service is running and are removed when the service
> is stopped. Try starting the service and they should appear.
>
> Regards,
> Sumitra Sujanani [MSFT]
>
> --------------------
203.200.51.98[vbcol=seagreen]
> BizTalk:TDDS,
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
> Connected Systems Division Team
>
>
> Get Connected!
> Meet and interact with key BizTalk Server program managers, developers,
and
> testers, and let them and other BizTalk Server community team members and
> Most Valuable Professionals help you solve your product questions.
>
> Navigate to http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/ in your
> webrowser and register as a managed customer to receive MSDN Managed
> Newsgroup Support!
>
> MSDN managed newsgroups are available in English to MSDN Universal,
> Enterprise, Professional, and Operating Systems subscribers to receive
> free, unlimited technical support on select Microsoft technologies as well
> as to share ideas with other subscribers.
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|