-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Apologies for Jack B Nymble

I must apologize for the JBN project. I deeply regret my involvement with th
is program. You must
understand that at the time I had no choice (no further explanation for secu
rity reasons). This has
haunted me for a long time. I thought I could just disappear and be done wit
h it, but my conscious
won't let it go. I pray no innocent people were harmed by this. I have been 
completely humiliated by
this experience, and hope to make it up to you by releasing a new and secure
 program in the future.
Please forgive me, and God bless.

RProcess
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: cp850

iQCVAwUBQyiydPpT5aEzcjq5AQE18AQAjrMy/ph48oC1aQpum8of/ACFQZlv3BJA
 CNSH78Itv6f+xajZkt9+zpRxz82Nz7a1n4gPadyx
Pu84eSLbdXVVEOU7I9qh50jM
CWQLr5pcnEH9SM8vw2ZwT+OY5/ZuU4m9GJsfvxiabpjs8gUmSa+eInk4GKbki4IM
3s7BYpPM9Ig=
=jwdl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"RProcess" <nobody@invalid.org> wrote in message
 news:d3aeb0ec7c49ce5c039b8d4b223e9dcd@an
on.mixmaster.mixmin.net...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Apologies for Jack B Nymble
>
> I must apologize for the JBN project. I deeply regret my involvement with
this program. You must
> understand that at the time I had no choice (no further explanation for
security reasons). This has
> haunted me for a long time. I thought I could just disappear and be done
with it, but my conscious
> won't let it go. I pray no innocent people were harmed by this. I have
been completely humiliated by
> this experience, and hope to make it up to you by releasing a new and
secure program in the future.
> Please forgive me, and God bless.

You should start taking your pills again.
SPAMMER

>
> RProcess
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3ia
> Charset: cp850
>
> iQCVAwUBQyiydPpT5aEzcjq5AQE18AQAjrMy/ph48oC1aQpum8of/ACFQZlv3BJA
>  CNSH78Itv6f+xajZkt9+zpRxz82Nz7a1n4gPadyx
Pu84eSLbdXVVEOU7I9qh50jM
> CWQLr5pcnEH9SM8vw2ZwT+OY5/ZuU4m9GJsfvxiabpjs8gUmSa+eInk4GKbki4IM
> 3s7BYpPM9Ig=
> =jwdl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 28 May 2006, RProcess <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

<SNIP boring, obvious forgery>

Look, moron, you have tried this crap before, and it never sticks. Go away
before someone drops a house on you.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

RProcess <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Apologies for Jack B Nymble
>
Not this shit again.

Listen up good.  This is not RProcess. It's not even a good forgery.

user1@home:~$ gpg --list-keys rprocess
pub   2048R/9310EE89 1997-11-05
uid                  RProcess <rprocess@nym.alias.net>

user1@home:~$ gpg --fingerprint --verbose --list-sigs rprocess gpg: using PG
P trust model
pub   2048R/9310EE89 1997-11-05
Key fingerprint = 97 AE F5 64 61 F0 D9 28  13 33 DE A5 06 7E 8E B4
uid                  RProcess <rprocess@nym.alias.net>
sig          9310EE89 1998-03-20  RProcess <rprocess@nym.alias.net>
sig          A428D689 1999-04-02  [User id not found]
sig          C19E5B2F 2000-07-27  [User id not found]
sig          3AC2839F 2001-05-21  [User id not found]
rev          C19E5B2F 2001-05-31  [User id not found]
sig          2EE9F536 1999-04-02  [User id not found]
sig          40D8EDF8 1999-12-25  [User id not found]

As you can see above, Rprocess used a pgp 2.6.x key
that was created on Nov 05, 1997

The forger's key is not available from keyservers and the original is
and the Key-Id of the forgery does not match either.

user1@home:~$ gpg --verify alleged-rprocess-post.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed 14 Sep 2005 06:29:56 PM CDT using RSA key ID 33723AB
9
gpg: requesting key 33723AB9 from ldap server keyserver.pgp.com
Host:           keyserver.pgp.com
Command:        GET
Server:         PGP Universal Server
Version:        2.0.4
gpgkeys: key FA53E5A133723AB9 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

Finally, everybody knows that RProcess cannot possibly make any posts at all
since He is dead.  Please note that his dissapearance coincides with the dea
th
of Disastry.

Disastry was RProcess.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

["Followup-To:" header set to alt.privacy.anon-server.]
On Mon, 29 May 2006 13:05:42 -0000, Anonymous wrote in
Message-Id: <4bd3abede9fac81004754b3eb052e309@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>:

[snip]

> Finally, everybody knows that RProcess cannot possibly make any posts at a
ll
> since He is dead.  Please note that his dissapearance coincides with the d
eath
> of Disastry.
>
> Disastry was RProcess.

I agree with everything else in your posting but I don't think there's
much evidence to support this claim.  Disastry died in an accident on
31st Oct 2002.  I think RProcess vanished at least 2 years before this.
They also conversed with each other in various threads; it would seem
strange to do this if they were in fact the same person.  

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBRHsGx2oLu9HNUqmMAQqpOAf9F+/OFjTI2oOzLPg41DXqk/b0dlSwdFbs
zIOf7r+6QuL0EP6Y8GuTm/ ukReS4twYH0VgZyoS+azhI5nVby7MazgrIrF4rkH
BM
 JlrD4K8h8xtdRrFRo4loZ2PHIvIp3LPPPP1T8s1B
lTaIOQx7mhvKSKfMhVh9Tw7o
e27IhaRgRTFO1zO/ oSGKvJgAoEadfZ95e5kUTAv+AIGQsgEKgDnb9zsv
mSrghLL5
 fOf6+XBAx+H5hy23zYx+BAlvrcJUFMlknAm9lkBU
Cd94Dfaq+lm0FvaBpTmUYv9q
IHe/ owkLbhKra09rgxJtd0clX4tdsgIYtHzUO6BpYYGc
a+7eLwgZGA==
=3Vpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
pub  1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE  EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid                            Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Mon, 29 May 2006 14:35:51 +0000 (UTC), Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote: 
>
> I agree with everything else in your posting but I don't think there's
> much evidence to support this claim.  Disastry died in an accident on
> 31st Oct 2002.  I think RProcess vanished at least 2 years before this.
> They also conversed with each other in various threads; it would seem
> strange to do this if they were in fact the same person.  
>

I also seem remember RProcess mention his distaste for programming in
linux during the reliable testing on the remops mailing list.
I don't think Disastry had this issue.

- --
Topaz Crow
No replies by email, sorry.
Reply to alt.anonymous.messages Subject: ATTN: Topaz Crow
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEex7M4oDzoI/ kMpIRAiGdAJ9susJev5+7YE01aycOwitC63ltKAC
fWsSK
Dvxzs5uhbTNBRgicrYFO8q0=
=Ts8W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]