 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-05-06 12:15 PM
Additional info, output of "luxadm -e port":
Found path to 2 HBA ports
Error: Invalid pathname -
/devices/pci@1d,700000/QLGC,qla@1/fp@0,0:devctl.
Error: Invalid pathname - /devices/pci@1d,700000/QLGC,qla@1/fp@0,0:fc.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-06-06 06:16 AM
If the lun was added before a reboot or -r you might need to do a luxadm -e
forcelip /wwn/path
"mishka" <michael.sternberg@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149501107.672245.135590@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Additional info, output of "luxadm -e port":
> Found path to 2 HBA ports
> Error: Invalid pathname -
> /devices/pci@1d,700000/QLGC,qla@1/fp@0,0:devctl.
> Error: Invalid pathname - /devices/pci@1d,700000/QLGC,qla@1/fp@0,0:fc.
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-06-06 12:14 PM
"luxadm -e forcelip /wwn/path" returns "could not get physical path to
the device". Maybe I've entered the wrong path ? Where I'm taking path
from ? Tried both from output of "luxadm -e port" and from output of
"cfgadm -alv"
Rodrick R. Brown =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0):
> If the lun was added before a reboot or -r you might need to do a luxadm =
-e[vbcol=seagreen]
> forcelip /wwn/path
>
> "mishka" <michael.sternberg@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1149501107.672245.135590@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-06-06 12:14 PM
performed "devfsadmin -C". performed "reboot -- -r". The disks did not
appeared in "format".
sd.conf located not in /etc but in /kernel/drv.
Each line there is of type:
name=3D"sd" class=3D"scsi" target=3D3 lun=3D0;
What parameters should I add ? My LUN is 0 (as seen from SANsurfer).
What target should I use ? I've added following line:
name=3D"sd" class=3D"scsi" target=3D2 lun=3D0 wwn=3D"210000E08B041286";
where wwn I've taken from "port name" of HBA from SANsurfer. Performed
"reboot -- -r". Did not appeared in "format" or in "cfgadm -al" output.
hemanand.gadgil@gmail.com =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0):
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi,
> try using command devfsadm -C if not the check the entry in sd.conf
> file in /etc folder .
> It must contain the physical name and the target to which the LUN is
> assigned to .
> If you are using any failover software like powerpath,pvlinks or
> Vertias DMP then check out for intiator type , every failover software
> has different settings of intiator type depending upon the storage
> hardware.
> I think most probably the manual entry in sd.conf file should resolve
> the issue.
>
> Hemanand Gadgil
> EMC Proven - CLARiiON Solutions and Implemntation Specailist
>
> michael.sternberg@gmail.com wrote:
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-06-06 12:14 PM
Additional information - related lines from /var/log/messages:
Qlogic qlc FCA Driver v20060103-2.10 (1)
NOTICE: Qlogic qlc(1): Link ONLINE
NOTICE: ql_power(1): qlc is powered ON
NOTICE: qlc(1): Firmware version 2.1.144
PCI-device: QLGC,qla@1, qlc1
qlc1 is /pci@1d,700000/QLGC,qla@1
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-06-06 06:14 PM
hemanand.gadgil@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> try using command devfsadm -C if not the check the entry in sd.conf
> file in /etc folder .
> It must contain the physical name and the target to which the LUN is
> assigned to .
> If you are using any failover software like powerpath,pvlinks or
> Vertias DMP then check out for intiator type , every failover software
> has different settings of intiator type depending upon the storage
> hardware.
> I think most probably the manual entry in sd.conf file should resolve
> the issue.
>
Are you sure? It looks to me like he's using Sun's SAN Foundation Kit
(SUNWsan), in which case explicit sd.conf entries are no longer necessary.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: Attaching SAN disk to Solaris 8 |
 |
 |
|
|
06-07-06 06:14 AM
What kind of SAN storage is it?
In case of EMC symmetrix, you need to add VCMDB entries. There are similar
masking entries for other storage boxes as well.
LUN 0 in case of symmetrix is usually the VCMDB itself, if you can see that,
it indicates that your zoning is correct, but you still need to mask the
devices.
<michael.sternberg@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149500573.950257.184660@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hello everybody.
>
> I'm trying to attach a SAN storage to Solaris 8 V210 server using
> Qlogic 2200 FC card. Already installed SUNWsan, SUNWqlc and SUNWqlcx
> together with all patches it required. I can see adapter, port, disk
> and LUNs via SANsurfer. But when I run "format" only local disks
> appear.
>
> Here's output of "cfgadm -al":
> Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition
> c0 scsi-bus connected configured unknown
> c0::dsk/c0t0d0 CD-ROM connected configured unknown
> c1 scsi-bus connected configured unknown
> c1::dsk/c1t0d0 disk connected configured unknown
> c1::dsk/c1t1d0 disk connected configured unknown
> c2 scsi-bus connected unconfigured unknown
>
> I suspect that I have problem with c2 entry. "cfgadm -c configure c2"
> does not prints anything and does not changes above output. I already
> had run "reboot -- -r" and "devfsadm" - did not changed anything..
>
> Please help.
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
|
|
|
|
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum
|
 |
|
 |
|