06-21-06 06:12 PM
> If I have an active/passive two node microsoft cluster, and I want to
> add a new LUN to it, is there any harm in allocating the new LUN to
> both nodes, then creating a Volume on the lun from the active node,
> then bringing it online as a cluster resource.
i guess thats the way to do it... :-)
with microsoft clusters you would be able to see the LUN on both
servers at once. once you allocate it as a cluster resource, on active
server you will be able to create volumes on it. on passive nodes, disk
manager would show that volume as "unknown". once the cluster fails
over, passive node will become active and be able to access the LUN
normally
> The only problem I can see is if you were stupid enought to try and
> create volumes on the same LUN from both nodes in the cluster.
when you share the LUN as cluster resource, afik, its cluster service's
headache to manage the access to shared LUN and since active node will
have ownership, passive nodes will not write on it.
someone please correct me if wrong.
Kiran Ghag
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|