Seems like a lot less hassle than Stunnel-Tor-Socks-JBN
and almost as anon.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

TwistyCreek wrote:

> Seems like a lot less hassle than Stunnel-Tor-Socks-JBN
> and almost as anon.

Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
around in Google. Or anywhere really. Turn off or filter as much crap
as you can using your browser's settings, use Privoxy or some other
content scrubber, or read up regarding the Firefox extensions and use
those.

Side note: The FoxyProxy extension looks very appealing at first
glance, but I believe it would be a bad thing. Setting individual sites
to be anonymized or not completely ignores things like hot linking that
cause your browser to look to another site for some of the page
content. You could be outed by visiting a page that called content from
a site that wasn't in your list. 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
> around in Google. Or anywhere really. Turn off or filter as much crap
> as you can using your browser's settings, use Privoxy or some other
> content scrubber, or read up regarding the Firefox extensions and use
> those.

I use Tor + Privoxy via Firefox, and I turn off Java, and also
set Firefox to delete data, cookies etc after shutdown.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:16:26 +0000, TwistyCreek wrote:
 
>
> I use Tor + Privoxy via Firefox, and I turn off Java, and also set Firefox
> to delete data, cookies etc after shutdown.

You need to turn off javascript as well.


>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The
> original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header is
> unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than
> alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org for abuse
> and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> >> Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking 
>
> You need to turn off javascript as well.

or use the noscript extension for selective control:

http://www.noscript.net/whats
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> or use the noscript extension for selective control:
>
> http://www.noscript.net/whats

I was about to install the plugin when I noticed
it's unsigned.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:43:10 +0000, TwistyCreek wrote:
 
>
> I was about to install the plugin when I noticed it's unsigned.

I have never installed anything that was signed and never have problems.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote in
news:P1TVOBT238956.6549768519@twistycreek.com:
 
>
> I was about to install the plugin when I noticed
> it's unsigned.

The problem there is that I've never seen a *signed* Firefox / Mozilla
plugin...


- --
http://blog.peculiarplace.com
http://lurasbookcase.com
http://purrfectdomains.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

 iQEVAwUBRPI7NHV+YnyE1GYEAQLh8ggAn7aDuoVH
X10IR8Mgt66lBGU0laUOQOtC
pEz4AqYEkWas/Ynt/MDk1c9bpBC+4mXcA/V8fcXXgCQeWkv1cup6qD7qKKAGuCwe
Zmxgy3qLP4Q6IH9qxhy/ FXjRoyFI07I76DqnOwiF5vlM9MWztB2Hz4mDDMSt
vLb8
 e3IvMwyj6r7PYHoIK74OeddQggzFoQNUNO4NUchD
Jt71ljfCYYIB4YPZyKOOwFX4
 POSVMYQ14I0TwVzz16w5PXooibpcAtnlOUmy1Zc+
lailNdsS02OZPV7p3JhaNa0o
G988KSRceFd/sKlpgkHNf/BddFPIo/+ajsw41BT8mMeVM7uWXh9LyA==
=f2W4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:

> Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
> around in Google. Or anywhere really. Turn off or filter as much crap
> as you can using your browser's settings, use Privoxy or some other
> content scrubber, or read up regarding the Firefox extensions and use
> those.

Clear cookies frequently.

> Side note: The FoxyProxy extension looks very appealing at first
> glance, but I believe it would be a bad thing. Setting individual sites
> to be anonymized or not completely ignores things like hot linking
> that

and third-party cookies

> cause your browser to look to another site for some of the page
> content. You could be outed by visiting a page that called content from
> a site that wasn't in your list. 

and other sneaky things too, I'm sure!

-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> Seems like a lot less hassle than Stunnel-Tor-Socks-JBN
> and almost as anon.

Would this system apply to setting up an anonymous blog?
I'd like to blog but I need pretty assured anonymity.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]