[jira] Commented: (JDO-429) StateTransitionsReturnedObjects assumes
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > Apache Server configuration support > Apache JDO Project > [jira] Commented: (JDO-429) StateTransitionsReturnedObjects assumes




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    [jira] Commented: (JDO-429) StateTransitionsReturnedObjects assumes  
Marc Prud'hommeaux (JIRA)


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
09-17-06 12:11 PM

[ [url]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-429?page=comments#action_12435288[/
url] ]

Marc Prud'hommeaux commented on JDO-429:
----------------------------------------

The same goes for element 10 of "serialize outside tx", which asserts that a
 persistent-nontransactional-dirty instance will become transient after seri
alize/deserialize, even though the specification seems to never mandate this
. detached-clean should be
an equally valid assertion.

> StateTransitionsReturnedObjects assumes that serializing deleted instances
 will transition them to transient
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-429
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-429
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tck20
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
>            Reporter: Marc Prud'hommeaux
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Elements 7 and 8 (0-based) of the "serialize with active tx" array in org/apache/j
do/tck/lifecycle/StateTransitionsReturnedObjects.java assert that a persistent-new-d
eleted and persistent-deleted instance (respectively) will transition to transient w
hen
then are serialized then deserialized. However, the specification does not seem to mandate t
his anywhere: detached-clean should be an equally valid state to be in.
> The easiest fix, short of changing the test case to allow for multiple states, is 
to change elements 7 and 8 from "TRANSIENT" to "IMPOSSIBLE", which will disable the 
state check altogether.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://iss
ues.apache.org/ji...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira








[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register