This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Pboxmix mixminion server at pboxmix.winstonsmith.info. If you
do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
admin@winstonsmith.info. For information about anonymity, see
https://www.winstonsmith.info/pws or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.



Suppose that I'm using hashcash strings for several m2n gateways.  Is it bet
ter to use one X-Hashcash header containing all the strings, separated by co
mmas?  Or is it better to use a separate X-Hashcash header for each string?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <20061025113644.hgedfqpkvbeD@newsanon.org>
nobody@pboxlevel3.homelinux.net wrote:
>
> Suppose that I'm using hashcash strings for several m2n gateways.
> Is it better to use one X-Hashcash header containing all the strings,
> separated by commas?  Or is it better to use a separate X-Hashcash
> header for each string?

That's an interesting question and one I'd never thought of.  I tested a
little bit and it seems that separating them by
commas on one line does work sometimes (which surprised me) but placing
them separately each with their own X-Hashcash:
line worked best and was much easier to keep straight.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]