10-26-06 06:11 PM
Chase,
This is not something we specifically tested. However, thinking it
through it /may/ work. You will, of course, still need to VPN from your
PC for your CTIOS client. PhoneProxy does not build a VPN tunnel, so
you can't piggy back on it for CTI OS.
Thanks,
Louis
________________________________
From: Casanova, Chase [mailto:ccasanova@rti.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:27 AM
To: Louis Marascio (lmarasci); Lelio Fulgenzi; Justin Steinberg; Steve
Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House
-NotesforSetup!
Will PhoneProxy work with IPCC CTIOS clients? We are testing the 871,
7940, and CTIOS on a laptop from home scenario.
-Chase
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Louis Marascio
(lmarasci)
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:18 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House
-NotesforSetup!
No worries. It is probably partly our fault. We were too busy running
hard to get integrated and thus orderable that we didn't have much time
to think about how to present PhoneProxy at CIPTUG. A few of our guys
did talk about CUAE, but unfortuantely PhoneProxy didn't get any love.
I'm taking tommorow off, so it is Friday for me. tee hee! 
Louis
________________________________
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:10 AM
To: Louis Marascio (lmarasci); Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -
NotesforSetup!
I don't think it's your fault Louis (unless of course you were at
CIPTUG! ;)......There were plenty of NDA sessions to talk about stuff
like this, and quite honestly, it's the place to talk about it rather
than misdirect people to another product. It's hard not to believe that
it is intentional sometimes.
But it's almost Friday..... ;)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Louis Marascio (lmarasci) <mailto:lmarasci@cisco.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca> ; Justin
Steinberg <mailto:jsteinberg@gmail.com> ; Steve Miller
<mailto:millerman1@cox.net>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -
NotesforSetup!
Lelio,
I'm sorry the messaging got confused after the acquisition. The
original PhoneProxy product (called SCCP Proxy) that we built at Metreos
was based on the CUAE. Prior to the acquisition, we at Metreos had
started to rebuild this product as a standalone appliance. It has taken
us some time after the acquisition to finish the integration, and thus
finish the product. The product is indeed going to be available from
Cisco, as a standalone appliance no longer based on or tied to the CUAE.
In fact, it is orderable as of today!
Again, sorry for the confusion.
Best regards,
Louis
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:47 AM
To: Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House -
NotesforSetup!
it's so frustrating when you ask about a product you know is
there and you get told it's no longer available.
i'm pretty sure this was the Metreos product and i was told the
product no longer exists and was being replaced by the app engine and
you had to write it yourself!
grrrrrrrr
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Steinberg <mailto:jsteinberg@gmail.com>
To: Steve Miller <mailto:millerman1@cox.net>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's
House - Notes forSetup!
If you are planning to deploy a lot of these setups you
should ask your SE about the phone proxy product.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7057/index.html
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...7/index.html%20>
On 10/25/06, Steve Miller <millerman1@cox.net> wrote:
The following is information that I have rec'd regarding
the installation of a 7961 at someone's house who is using cable or DSL.
Is there anything else that we might need to think about? Thank you!
Notes from cisco Engineer:
The remote equipment at the home office would consist of
a cisco 871 router and a cisco phone with a power block. The cisco 871
would function as the home office's firewall and router (and would
connect to either a cable modem or a DSL modem depending on the site).
The router would be configured to have an IPSec tunnel back to the
office network (most likely configured off of your existing
concentrator). The remote cisco 871 would be configured with DHCP and
have the TFTP scope option set to tell all devices the IP address of the
Call Manager server (note the router has a built-in four port switch).
At that point, the IP Phone would register normally to
the Call Manager servers using the IPSec tunnel as it's communication
path. The keepalives from the phone to the CM servers would keep the
IPSec tunnel up and running 24/7.
The restrictions on this type of deployment are:
-must use G729 codec due to
bandwidth restrictions
-extremely limited QoS control
since we are going across the Internet
-security policies need to be
visited since the remote office would have access to the corporate
internal network (this one is a biggie)
-sub-issue regarding
calling from home office to home office. This is doable but adds
additional security and deployment issues.
-need to consider the standard
IT management overhead associated with supporting home equipment.
Thank you!
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
 Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
