I am not sure if anyone got the same problem before, but I didn't find
anything posted.

I have a website built on .NET Framework 1.1 which uses MCMS.
A template has a custom property with a collection of fixed values.
Another template uses this custom property to filter out postings by
listing the values of this property in a drop down box.

This works fine on my local machine with MCMS SP1 installed. I have
transferred the site on the staging server where MCMS SP1a is
installled, but uses the same Database server and these custom property
values are not populated in the drop down box. Postings and channels
are shown ok.

Does anyone got this problem before or knows how to overcome this
problem??

Thanks,

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi,

this is not a known problem.
Did you already debug your code that is responsible for the population of
the values?

Cheers,
Stefan


"g@work" <gpavlou@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161948586.560809.127250@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>I am not sure if anyone got the same problem before, but I didn't find
> anything posted.
>
> I have a website built on .NET Framework 1.1 which uses MCMS.
> A template has a custom property with a collection of fixed values.
> Another template uses this custom property to filter out postings by
> listing the values of this property in a drop down box.
>
> This works fine on my local machine with MCMS SP1 installed. I have
> transferred the site on the staging server where MCMS SP1a is
> installled, but uses the same Database server and these custom property
> values are not populated in the drop down box. Postings and channels
> are shown ok.
>
> Does anyone got this problem before or knows how to overcome this
> problem??
>
> Thanks,
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your reply, it seems to be a  permission problem! But did
not manage to solve it yet.

Thanks, Georgia




Stefan Go=DFner [MSFT] wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi,
>
> this is not a known problem.
> Did you already debug your code that is responsible for the population of
> the values?
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>
> "g@work" <gpavlou@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1161948586.560809.127250@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]