Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?

At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down,
as far as posting to ng is concerned.

Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?

Notice that others are also complaining that no postings using QS
seem to get through.

Also, which remailers are still working, with which M2N?

Thanks

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <1ZWITWFI39049.1653703704@anonymous.poster>
FredBurg@roc.usenetexchange.com (FredBurg) wrote:
>
> Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
> At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down,
> as far as posting to ng is concerned.
>
> Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
>
> Notice that others are also complaining that no postings using QS
> seem to get through.

For the 94,547,208th time, if your QS postings aren't showing up
then it's because either you XXXXed something up or there is a
genuine problem that affects the mail2news gateway you're using.

If it's a problem with the gateway then it will affect _ALL_
messages going through it and you need to find another m2n
gateway. The m2n gateways do not have a way to determine which
client you used to create a message and discriminate based on
your client. If QS doesn't work, then JBN won't work and even
'hand-rolling' a message won't work because the gateway won't
deliver _A_N_Y_ messages. The fact that your stupis-assed trolls
keep showing up says that's not the case.

Do me a favor... pull your bottom lip over your head and swallow!

>
> Also, which remailers are still working, with which M2N?
>
> Thanks

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <1ZWITWFI39049.1653703704@anonymous.poster>
FredBurg@roc.usenetexchange.com (FredBurg) wrote:
>
> Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
> At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down,
> as far as posting to ng is concerned.
>
> Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
>
> Notice that others are also complaining that no postings using QS
> seem to get through.

For the 94,547,208th time, if your QS postings aren't showing up
then it's because either you XXXXed something up or there is a
genuine problem that affects the mail2news gateway you're using.

If it's a problem with the gateway then it will affect _ALL_
messages going through it and you need to find another m2n
gateway. The m2n gateways do not have a way to determine which
client you used to create a message and discriminate based on
your client. If QS doesn't work, then JBN won't work and even
'hand-rolling' a message won't work because the gateway won't
deliver _A_N_Y_ messages. The fact that your stupis-assed trolls
keep showing up says that's not the case.

Do me a favor... pull your bottom lip over your head and swallow!

>
> Also, which remailers are still working, with which M2N?
>
> Thanks

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

FredBurg wrote:

> Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
> At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down,
> as far as posting to ng is concerned.
>
> Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
>
> Notice that others are also complaining that no postings using QS
> seem to get through.

So what you're saying is there's more than one moron out there who
can't quite seem to figure out a simple point-and-click piece of
software running in a GUI environment that's been dumbed down to the
level of a 4 year old?

Ok. I guess that's not really a surprise.......

>
> Also, which remailers are still working, with which M2N?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]