This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at deuxpi.ca.  If you do not want to receive anonymous
messages, please contact deuxpi-admin@deuxpi.ca.  For more information
about anonymity, see http://mixminion.net.

Please find hereafter a complaint which was just sent to the admin email add
ress of my remailer. Some seem to find it funny to abuse remailers.

Copy of Complaint:
- --------------------

To whom it may concern,

on Thursday 2 November 2006 at 01:07 hrs a bomb threat email was sent to
The British High Commission in Wellington New Zealand. The email address it
was sent to was bhc.wel@xtra.co.nz.

A Police investigation has been commenced to track down where the threat
was sent from and who sent it

This particular email header stated to report inappropriate use to
xxx@yyy.zzz

I would appreciate any information to help with the investigation.

Regards

Robbie Campbell
Constable/Protection Officer RCG366
Diplomatic Protection Squad
Tactical Groups Service Centre
Police National Headquaters
PO Box 693, Wellington
Telephone: +64 4 496-3487
Facsimile:   +64 4 470-1606
Email: Robert.Campbell@police.govt.nz

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[Anon] BombThreats wrote:
>
> Please find hereafter a complaint which was just sent to the admin email address o
f my remailer. Some seem to find it funny to abuse remailers.

I thought you used filters to prevent this kind of thing? What went
wrong XXXXXXX? Just be glad your opt-in system worked and the threat got
delivered so now you can help the Australian officer solve this 'case'.

Too bad you didn't sign your post so it could be another abuser
publishing the personal details of this officer and not you Eelbash.

(but the officer who send this message will know what it looked like and
who he send it to, which will very likely turn out to be you)

Alas, one more address to block for the other remops.
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iQB5AwUBRX6rIgEP2l8iXKAJAQFClAMeMleg4stF
Q7F9sYW46A6l1KhQwBkNRpDW
 6QGlXVpuKwNe4vxSeRh4QilmS2wo2x3VmvOFRvJs
tUrunQ9u+XYUy++XJQonfvwS
 SNUz3OkyorqJWhYotHMrE4MmKH2Q9kfrxepk6w==

=MYAf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, "[Anon] BombThreats" <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
>server at deuxpi.ca.  If you do not want to receive anonymous
>messages, please contact deuxpi-admin@deuxpi.ca.  For more information
>about anonymity, see http://mixminion.net.
>
>Please find hereafter a complaint which was just sent to the admin email
>address of my remailer. Some seem to find it funny to abuse remailers.
>
>Copy of Complaint:
>- --------------------
>
>To whom it may concern,
>
>on Thursday 2 November 2006 at 01:07 hrs a bomb threat email was sent to
>The British High Commission in Wellington New Zealand. The email address it
>was sent to was bhc.wel@xtra.co.nz.
>
>A Police investigation has been commenced to track down where the threat
>was sent from and who sent it
>
>This particular email header stated to report inappropriate use to
>xxx@yyy.zzz
>
>I would appreciate any information to help with the investigation.
>
>Regards
>
>Robbie Campbell
>Constable/Protection Officer RCG366
>Diplomatic Protection Squad
>Tactical Groups Service Centre
>Police National Headquaters
>PO Box 693, Wellington
>Telephone: +64 4 496-3487
>Facsimile:   +64 4 470-1606
>Email: Robert.Campbell@police.govt.nz

Do you think that the email message caused the bomb threat,
or a bomb?

Since you're filtering messages anyway, just block any messages
with "explosive", "bomb" or other terrorist type words.  That way,
when the bombs explode, no one will have been warned.

JAP

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

J.Alfred Prufrock wrote:
[snip]
> Do you think that the email message caused the bomb threat,
> or a bomb?

It is a good thing they don't have remailers in Iraq or the situation
there would have been a lot worse!

> Since you're filtering messages anyway, just block any messages
> with "explosive", "bomb" or other terrorist type words.  That way,
> when the bombs explode, no one will have been warned.

Agreed. But all other remops should just go middle instead of filtering
on content.

This is very important! Can't take the heat, go middle. NOW!
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iQB5AwUBRX7rDAEP2l8iXKAJAQG+WgMeJeusb3NY
fpaG1tuKCZUz4OwYE+g6WNaS
 XyJ75jFpr3eIKrycVgta3E3TEr3vvHtGMSHDzwCP
awcH+dlVnRqSPt8/lKc9GtjU
 b4Qtw7yGsdKvq19WKCdZKD80hNsm7ov6MER9gQ==

=DcCu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
[snip]
> It is a good thing they don't have remailers in Iraq or the situation
> there would have been a lot worse!

Before everyone gets upset again and starts sending angry e-mails again.

I mean. Iraq -> no remailers -> lots of bombs going off
Coalition against the Axis of Evil members -> all other remailers ->
almost no bombs going off (except in London where they thought up the
RIP bill which would have rendered remailers in England useless)

So remailers must have had some positive effect in our continuing fight
on terror, right? Could it be that freedom of speech is the best
offensive weapon that can be deployed against terror? Why blow someone
up when you can flame them to bits on the internet?!

If remailers were deployed in Iraq, enduring freedom there could
organize itself and fight terror. It is so easy!

Go do raids on innocent people, torture them about bombs they don't know
about and people get upset. It is not that hard to understand, is it?

Yes, I was being sarcastic in my previous post. Am I ever not?
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iQB5AwUBRX7vKQEP2l8iXKAJAQHzzAMgte2V+EvN
CJjviy3Ola9O7seMh1awNgI8
3RaCVnf9Fb0ABHOzqbeDOqs2aNIPbja/VMmGxF341G5LVphWvCSZVr+OhkyeV/PL
 2vC0Wl5DQNm5nfKWJYf+CchZoCmPx9dAVMq5sA==

=WVaz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

You are an ignorant XXXXXXX. You blame eelbash for something he has not done
 instead of focusing on the real problem, the son of a XXXXX who has abused 
the remailer.
The abuse is the problem the remailer network is facing and that's why the i
nitiative of RAAA is of great value.

I would be happy to belong to RAAA to support them to deliver these abusers 
to the LEAs.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article < f0159d8afba80acc4f3dbc8c54105a1c@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> You are an ignorant XXXXXXX. You blame eelbash for something he has not do
ne instead of focusing on the real problem, the son of a XXXXX who has abuse
d the remailer.
> The abuse is the problem the remailer network is facing and that's why the
 initiative of RAAA is of great value.
>
> I would be happy to belong to RAAA to support them to deliver these abusers to the
 LEAs.



SHUT UP EELBASH!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

George Orwell wrote:
> You are an ignorant XXXXXXX. You blame eelbash for something he has not done inste
ad of focusing on the real problem, the son of a XXXXX who has abused the remailer.[
/vbcol]

Who the XXXX are you? Eelbash's mother? Why don't you let the dumbass
speak for himself. I am not even yet sure there was an abuse done to him
anyhow. I always thought he was the one doing all the abuse in this
group (together with his papa Frog-Admin).

One thing is for sure though. If the complaint is genuine it was a remop
that posted it and not an enduser. Go hurt your little brain over that.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> The abuse is the problem the remailer network is facing and that's why the initiat
ive of RAAA is of great value.

Just like the second war against Iraq has been of great value to improve
the security and stability in the rest of the world. Even really stupid
people can make really stupid decisions. Go hurt your little brain over
that one too.

> I would be happy to belong to RAAA to support them to deliver these abusers to the
 LEAs.

You are either a mocking of Eelbash getting out of hand or you are
Eelbash Admin himself.

I feel no pity,
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQB5AwUBRX/ uJgEP2l8iXKAJAQFpOQMeIQ1BOE5GmOzPnpjYbWA
rZdTFL2biNL7H
 GglbRfjUxc08igvo1ynI77XPUQIPB4vD4zFd3hai
6T9nCgkFjXICxFnNTbUGy1sp
 7wwlyqkoc35SnLrE44IEIu5KdujU0h5A6DQhBA==

=nfMv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>I thought you used filters to prevent this kind of thing? What went
>wrong XXXXXXX? Just be glad your opt-in system worked and the threat got
>delivered so now you can help the Australian officer solve this 'case'.

I see you've been ducking geography class, Thomas.....

F-A

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]