"Ed Mullen" <ed@edmullen.net> wrote in message
news:_o-dnaVtksEpMhfYnZ2dnUVZ_qCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Mosley Jones III wrote: 
>
> Sigh.  Citing an article that is a year-and-a-half old is hardly enhancing
> your already non-existent credibility.
>
> Also, the article cited makes only ONE citation regarding prefetching and
> that is when a user uses Google.  How does that affect statistics on YOUR
> server?  Answer:  It does not.


You feeble loser, you do not need Google to prefetch pages.
you have made a complete fool of yourself
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/doc...s_prefetched.3F


>
> You obviously have no idea what prefetching is or how it works. I suggest
> you do some research before you continue making such incorrect statements.
> Unless one specifically puts the correct tags into the HTML documents,
> Firefox will NOT prefetch anything when visiting someone's site.
>
> In case you want to actually educate yourself on prefetching I'm giving
> you the link:
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/doc...prefetching_FAQ
>
> I doubt you'll read it and, if you do, I'm pretty sure you won't be back
> here to admit your ignorance.
>
> --
> Ed Mullen
> http://edmullen.net
> http://mozilla.edmullen.net
> http://abington.edmullen.net
> What's another word for synonym?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

One person's opinion . . . . . . .

On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:30:49 +0900, "Mosley Jones III"
<administrator@info.gov.mars> wrote:

>
>"Ed Mullen" <ed@edmullen.net> wrote in message
>news:_o-dnaVtksEpMhfYnZ2dnUVZ_qCmnZ2d@comcast.com... 
>
>
>You feeble loser, you do not need Google to prefetch pages.
>you have made a complete fool of yourself
>http://developer.mozilla.org/en/doc...s_prefetched.3F
>
> 
>

Old enough . . .
to know I don't know a thing.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]