Template toolkit: removed functionality issue
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Unix and Linux reviews > Free Debian support > Debian Developers > Template toolkit: removed functionality issue




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Template toolkit: removed functionality issue  
Dominic Hargreaves


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
12-23-06 06:35 AM

Hello,

I write as someone preparing an NMU for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr...cgi?bug=393311.

Template Toolkit 2.15 removed a few plugin modules from the main
distribution and I would like to package this new version.
The plugins removed are:

Template::Plugin::DBI
Template::Plugin::XML
Template::Plugin::GD

I've checked packages depending on libtemplate-perl, and the only
package that appears to use any of these plugin modules is bugzilla.
Would it therefore be okay to simply package libtemplate-plugin-gd-perl,
and have bugzilla depend on it (and possibly the equivalent
libtemplate-plugin-dbi-perl and libtemplate-plugin-gd-perl packages),
and then upload a new libtemplate-perl reflecting upstream's changes
with a NEWS.Debian entry explaining the change? Should libtemplate-perl
then Recommend or Depend on the new separate plugin modules? My
intuition would be to avoid a Depends.

Thanks,

Dominic.

--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.or
g





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Template toolkit: removed functionality issue  
Benj. Mako Hill


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
12-24-06 06:39 AM

<quote who="Dominic Hargreaves" date="Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 04:47:10PM +0000">
> I write as someone preparing an NMU for
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr...cgi?bug=393311.
>
> Template Toolkit 2.15 removed a few plugin modules from the main
> distribution and I would like to package this new version.
> The plugins removed are:
>
> Template::Plugin::DBI
> Template::Plugin::XML
> Template::Plugin::GD
>
> I've checked packages depending on libtemplate-perl, and the only
> package that appears to use any of these plugin modules is bugzilla.
> Would it therefore be okay to simply package libtemplate-plugin-gd-perl,
> and have bugzilla depend on it (and possibly the equivalent
> libtemplate-plugin-dbi-perl and libtemplate-plugin-gd-perl packages),
> and then upload a new libtemplate-perl reflecting upstream's changes
> with a NEWS.Debian entry explaining the change? Should libtemplate-perl
> then Recommend or Depend on the new separate plugin modules? My
> intuition would be to avoid a Depends.

If Bugzilla can be updated to include a depends on the new package, it
should be turned into a recommends.

Later,
Mako


--
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako@debian.org
http://mako.cc/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.or
g





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register