Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2006-12-26, yogesh <yogeshkumark@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>
> How would we know?  Do a "make" and fix whatever doesn't work.
>
> But first, be warned: RedHat 8.0 is very old, and it was also
> very broken.  It was so bad that it was the one version of RH,
> that the company I was working for back then refused to
> support.  If you really must run something ancient, run RH 7.3.

Yes, that was a very good release. I ran it 24/7 for over 6 months with no
trouble. I ran it from when it first came out until just before the end of
RH9. I then tried Fedora Core 2 that did not work well for me, and went to
CentOS 4.0 (since upgraded to 4.4) after that.
> 
>
> RH 8.0 was a disaster. Help yourself by picking something a
> little newer and a lot less broken.
>


--
.~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 09:00:01 up 66 days, 11:32, 3 users, load average: 4.07, 4.18, 4.19

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]