12-27-06 06:11 PM
You are correct, that's how I have things set up. So I guess CallManager doe
s some preprocessing and will only apply the transformations that are config
ured on the last level?
I'll have to check CDRs, but I'd rather not have the 9 on the CDR and/or the
phone display. I'll have to do some more testing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Ryan Ratliff
To: lelio@uoguelph.ca
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dropping 9 on route pattern and adding 9 on ro
ute list doesn't work
Did you leave the external phone mask setting on the Route List
details page to Default or set to On/Off? Leaving it default at the
RL page will keep the Route Pattern setting, but this is the only
option that works this way. All other settings on the route list
details page will overwrite those on the route pattern of the same name.
-Ryan
On Dec 26, 2006, at 5:11 PM, lelio@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Interesting, I always thought they were cummulative, albeit it the
router list would be the last one applied and overwriting any
previous changes. I'm sure I drop the 9 on my route pattern and then
add the external calling mask on the route list. Is it in sections
that the 'overwrite' occurs?
My main goal is that I don't want the 9 to appear on the telephone
display (or the CDRs).
Quoting Ryan Ratliff <rratliff@cisco.com>:
> Modifications done on a Route List will overwrite anything done at the
> Route Pattern, they are not cumulative.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Dec 22, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> For some reason, I can't get a call to work when I drop the 9 on the
> route pattern and add it back in on the route list. I have a centrex
> line that requires a 9 to dial out. When I leave the 9 on the route
> pattern it works fine. Any ideas? I get the same error message when I
> plug a phone into the line and dial the number without the 9. I'm
> using
> an FXO port on a 3640.
>
> Wierd.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|