 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-16-07 06:12 PM
----- sitharus@4qu74xNHQeaMtN_zcpAshNZ3d1Y ----- 2007.01.14 - 06:12:26GMT
-----
From http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
How NSA access was built into Windows
=======================
Duncan Campbell 04.09.1999
Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA.
A CARELESS mistake by Microsoft programmers has revealed that special
access codes prepared by the US National Security Agency have been secretly
built into Windows. The NSA access system is built into every version of
the Windows operating system now in use, except early releases of Windows
95 (and its predecessors). The discovery comes close on the heels of the
revelations earlier this year that another US software giant, Lotus, had
built an NSA "help information" [local] trapdoor into its Notes system,
and
that security functions on other software systems had been deliberately
crippled.
The first discovery of the new NSA access system was made two years ago by
British researcher Dr Nicko van Someren. But it was only a few weeks ago
when a second researcher rediscovered the access system. With it, he found
the evidence linking it to NSA.
Computer security specialists have been aware for two years that unusual
features are contained inside a standard Windows software "driver" used for
security and encryption functions. The driver, called ADVAPI.DLL, enables
and controls a range of security functions. If you use Windows, you will
find it in the C:\Windows\system directory of your computer.
ADVAPI.DLL works closely with Microsoft Internet Explorer, but will only
run crypographic functions that the US governments allows Microsoft to
export. That information is bad enough news, from a European point of view.
Now, it turns out that ADVAPI will run special programmes inserted and
controlled by NSA. As yet, no-one knows what these programmes are, or what
they do.
Dr Nicko van Someren reported at last year's Crypto 98 conference that he
had disassembled the ADVADPI driver. He found it contained two different
keys. One was used by Microsoft to control the cryptographic functions
enabled in Windows, in compliance with US export regulations. But the
reason for building in a second key, or who owned it, remained a mystery.
A second key
-----------
Two weeks ago, a US security company came up with conclusive evidence that
the second key belongs to NSA. Like Dr van Someren, Andrew Fernandez, chief
scientist with Cryptonym of Morrisville, North Carolina, had been probing
the presence and significance of the two keys. Then he checked the latest
Service Pack release for Windows NT4, [extern] Service Pack 5. He found
that Microsoft's developers had failed to remove or "strip" the debugging
symbols used to test this software before they released it. Inside the code
were the labels for the two keys. One was called "KEY". The other was
called "NSAKEY".
Fernandes reported his re-discovery of the two CAPI keys, and their secret
meaning, to "Advances in Cryptology, Crypto'99" conference held in Santa
Barbara. According to those present at the conference, Windows developers
attending the conference did not deny that the "NSA" key was built into
their software. But they refused to talk about what the key did, or why it
had been put there without users' knowledge.
A third key?!
----------
But according to two witnesses attending the conference, even Microsoft's
top crypto programmers were astonished to learn that the version of
ADVAPI.DLL shipping with Windows 2000 contains not two, but three keys.
Brian LaMachia, head of CAPI development at Microsoft was "stunned" to
learn of these discoveries, by outsiders. The latest discovery by Dr van
Someren is based on advanced search methods which test and report on the
"entropy" of programming code.
Within the Microsoft organisation, access to Windows source code is said to
be highly compartmentalized, making it easy for modifications to be
inserted without the knowledge of even the respective product managers.
Researchers are divided about whether the NSA key could be intended to let
US government users of Windows run classified cryptosystems on their
machines or whether it is intended to open up anyone's and everyone's
Windows computer to intelligence gathering techniques deployed by NSA's
burgeoning corps of "information warriors".
According to Fernandez of Cryptonym, the result of having the secret key
inside your Windows operating system "is that it is tremendously easier for
the NSA to load unauthorized security services on all copies of Microsoft
Windows, and once these security services are loaded, they can effectively
compromise your entire operating system". The NSA key is contained inside
all versions of Windows from Windows 95 OSR2 onwards.
"For non-American IT managers relying on Windows NT to operate highly
secure data centres, this find is worrying", he added. "The US government
is currently making it as difficult as possible for "strong" crypto to be
used outside of the US. That they have also installed a cryptographic
back-door in the world's most abundant operating system should send a
strong message to foreign IT managers".
"How is an IT manager to feel when they learn that in every copy of Windows
sold, Microsoft has a 'back door' for NSA - making it orders of magnitude
easier for the US government to access your computer?" he asked.
Can the loophole be turned round against the snoopers?
----------------------------------------------
Dr van Someren feels that the primary purpose of the NSA key inside Windows
may be for legitimate US government use. But he says that there cannot be a
legitimate explanation for the third key in Windows 2000 CAPI. "It looks
more fishy", he said.
Fernandez believes that NSA's built-in loophole can be turned round against
the snoopers. The NSA key inside CAPI can be replaced by your own key, and
used to sign cryptographic security modules from overseas or unauthorised
third parties, unapproved by Microsoft or the NSA. This is exactly what the
US government has been trying to prevent. A demonstration "how to do it"
program that replaces the NSA key can be found on Cryptonym's [extern]
website.
According to one leading US cryptographer, the IT world should be thankful
that the subversion of Windows by NSA has come to light before the arrival
of CPUs that handles encrypted instruction sets. These would make the type
of discoveries made this month impossible. "Had the next-generation CPU's
with encrypted instruction sets already been deployed, we would have never
found out about NSAKEY."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-16-07 06:12 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote:
> ----- sitharus@4qu74xNHQeaMtN_zcpAshNZ3d1Y ----- 2007.01.14 - 06:12:26GMT
> -----
>
> From http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
>
> How NSA access was built into Windows
> =======================
> Duncan Campbell 04.09.1999
> Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA.
>
> A CARELESS mistake by Microsoft programmers has revealed that special
> access codes prepared by the US National Security Agency have been secretl
y
> built into Windows. The NSA access system is built into every version of
> the Windows operating system now in use, except early releases of Windows
> 95 (and its predecessors). The discovery comes close on the heels of the
> revelations earlier this year that another US software giant, Lotus, had
> built an NSA "help information" [local] trapdoor into its Notes system
, and
> that security functions on other software systems had been deliberately
> crippled.
>
> The first discovery of the new NSA access system was made two years ago by
> British researcher Dr Nicko van Someren. But it was only a few weeks ago
> when a second researcher rediscovered the access system. With it, he found
> the evidence linking it to NSA.
>
> Computer security specialists have been aware for two years that unusual
> features are contained inside a standard Windows software "driver" used fo
r
> security and encryption functions. The driver, called ADVAPI.DLL, enables
> and controls a range of security functions. If you use Windows, you will
> find it in the C:\Windows\system directory of your computer.
>
> ADVAPI.DLL works closely with Microsoft Internet Explorer, but will only
> run crypographic functions that the US governments allows Microsoft to
> export. That information is bad enough news, from a European point of view
.
> Now, it turns out that ADVAPI will run special programmes inserted and
> controlled by NSA. As yet, no-one knows what these programmes are, or what
> they do.
>
> Dr Nicko van Someren reported at last year's Crypto 98 conference that he
> had disassembled the ADVADPI driver. He found it contained two different
> keys. One was used by Microsoft to control the cryptographic functions
> enabled in Windows, in compliance with US export regulations. But the
> reason for building in a second key, or who owned it, remained a mystery.
>
> A second key
> -----------
>
> Two weeks ago, a US security company came up with conclusive evidence that
> the second key belongs to NSA. Like Dr van Someren, Andrew Fernandez, chie
f
> scientist with Cryptonym of Morrisville, North Carolina, had been probing
> the presence and significance of the two keys. Then he checked the latest
> Service Pack release for Windows NT4, [extern] Service Pack 5. He foun
d
> that Microsoft's developers had failed to remove or "strip" the debugging
> symbols used to test this software before they released it. Inside the cod
e
> were the labels for the two keys. One was called "KEY". The other was
> called "NSAKEY".
>
> Fernandes reported his re-discovery of the two CAPI keys, and their secret
> meaning, to "Advances in Cryptology, Crypto'99" conference held in Santa
> Barbara. According to those present at the conference, Windows developers
> attending the conference did not deny that the "NSA" key was built into
> their software. But they refused to talk about what the key did, or why it
> had been put there without users' knowledge.
>
> A third key?!
> ----------
>
> But according to two witnesses attending the conference, even Microsoft's
> top crypto programmers were astonished to learn that the version of
> ADVAPI.DLL shipping with Windows 2000 contains not two, but three keys.
> Brian LaMachia, head of CAPI development at Microsoft was "stunned" to
> learn of these discoveries, by outsiders. The latest discovery by Dr van
> Someren is based on advanced search methods which test and report on the
> "entropy" of programming code.
>
> Within the Microsoft organisation, access to Windows source code is said t
o
> be highly compartmentalized, making it easy for modifications to be
> inserted without the knowledge of even the respective product managers.
>
> Researchers are divided about whether the NSA key could be intended to let
> US government users of Windows run classified cryptosystems on their
> machines or whether it is intended to open up anyone's and everyone's
> Windows computer to intelligence gathering techniques deployed by NSA's
> burgeoning corps of "information warriors".
>
> According to Fernandez of Cryptonym, the result of having the secret key
> inside your Windows operating system "is that it is tremendously easier fo
r
> the NSA to load unauthorized security services on all copies of Microsoft
> Windows, and once these security services are loaded, they can effectively
> compromise your entire operating system". The NSA key is contained inside
> all versions of Windows from Windows 95 OSR2 onwards.
>
> "For non-American IT managers relying on Windows NT to operate highly
> secure data centres, this find is worrying", he added. "The US government
> is currently making it as difficult as possible for "strong" crypto to be
> used outside of the US. That they have also installed a cryptographic
> back-door in the world's most abundant operating system should send a
> strong message to foreign IT managers".
>
> "How is an IT manager to feel when they learn that in every copy of Window
s
> sold, Microsoft has a 'back door' for NSA - making it orders of magnitude
> easier for the US government to access your computer?" he asked.
>
> Can the loophole be turned round against the snoopers?
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Dr van Someren feels that the primary purpose of the NSA key inside Window
s
> may be for legitimate US government use. But he says that there cannot be
a
> legitimate explanation for the third key in Windows 2000 CAPI. "It looks
> more fishy", he said.
>
> Fernandez believes that NSA's built-in loophole can be turned round agains
t
> the snoopers. The NSA key inside CAPI can be replaced by your own key, and
> used to sign cryptographic security modules from overseas or unauthorised
> third parties, unapproved by Microsoft or the NSA. This is exactly what th
e
> US government has been trying to prevent. A demonstration "how to do it"
> program that replaces the NSA key can be found on Cryptonym's [extern]
> website.
>
> According to one leading US cryptographer, the IT world should be thankful
> that the subversion of Windows by NSA has come to light before the arrival
> of CPUs that handles encrypted instruction sets. These would make the type
> of discoveries made this month impossible. "Had the next-generation CPU's
> with encrypted instruction sets already been deployed, we would have never
> found out about NSAKEY."
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
> is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
> than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
> for abuse and hashcash info.
>
>
This is at best very old news:
<http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB19990903S0014>
The date on this story is September 03, 1999 (11:05 AM EST).
It is at worst a hoax:
<http://www.windowsbbs.com/showthread.php?t=2519>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBRaznK1+iaVoeuMy2AQq2ag//dM9rt9dGACi1BNAVWRggH5wL+AGu/bpY
lBhnhlja7DrzRteDV3wyuJ2htK0h4tjHleR7V1gI
K3EgNFDm8Xl8U3kNbI+nt2z1
gYbvFIfSMKomQc3ZY9tX4PUE2Mb++kw8sHyMeJJ0
YXNsv+2LMLejkU7TLzEZ9zL/
sMH1RBDljuHCjyoauHbYLOjhcsUnRUxaRAnNGE7C
p9DUIaYiUN0JFQxNfI2c5U/E
MOrGm2+GuZuqOdXsPw+JRoiUZtxqGXCGumCg0JTD
ek0tFoK80zJv7RdI4orYNkYq
aLn8B3wl/Um7N+SpC7bNiN/ NA+rspHK+4v8pNTM25aRKTTqTnT6wtR9GPQo43uo
9
f1oQ1Mij4FbH3iXWFWmXyvYLRT8M8o12DJmo5mCs
51qBUS1Ml5UFya7iNuG4IIDN
PRLbSKwz1Dj2jzNTYDnSyAS7J+o0+0fhVK95VVQM
ZvZINh2GdtLJVkjwO1Oex+nL
JFkq1+jKAA5X/ Kk9PSJO5Er+ElPM3G86wvlyaWvmpKMNSGvPefTHz
ayo/PT0KkYu
8dZUdYJqtFsFzA3KR5aTg7WhqBdioW6jl8kpLNoH
Yv2SlLKGM9vTiFmgiBLppdc8
DYwTcJ0XqJPMWBe+KN9/ eTMkTFFncvCSgWPKc9ka5yP4cB5dCsqvfOyeE4r1
w7Ge
UrThjnfatOw=
=aePj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-16-07 06:12 PM
In article <UQ2GSXQ439098.5009837963@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous via Panta Rhei <anonymous@panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- sitharus@4qu74xNHQeaMtN_zcpAshNZ3d1Y ----- 2007.01.14 - 06:12:26GMT
> -----
>
> From http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
>
> How NSA access was built into Windows
> =======================
> Duncan Campbell 04.09.1999
> Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA.
Can't you asswipes wait until April 1st for this kind of crap?
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-17-07 06:17 AM
Jeezus christ... did you have to quote the entire friggin' message for your
one line blurb..??? Get with the program pal.
"ron" <zypher@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:5Iudnd1Fj6-sejHYnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com...
> This is at best very old news:
>
> The date on this story is September 03, 1999 (11:05 AM EST).
>
> It is at worst a hoax:
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-17-07 06:17 AM
Anonymous via Panta Rhei <anonymous@panta-rhei.eu.org> writes:
>----- sitharus@4qu74xNHQeaMtN_zcpAshNZ3d1Y ----- 2007.01.14 - 06:12:26GMT
>-----
>From http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
>How NSA access was built into Windows
>=======================
>Duncan Campbell 04.09.1999
>Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA.
I assume next you will find an article from 1492 placing a further brick
into you edifice of paranoia.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-17-07 06:17 AM
Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> writes:
>In article <UQ2GSXQ439098.5009837963@anonymous.poster>
>Anonymous via Panta Rhei <anonymous@panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Can't you asswipes wait until April 1st for this kind of crap?
He did. It just took him 8 years to post.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-17-07 12:12 PM
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:13:21 +0000, The Equalizer wrote:
> Jeezus christ... did you have to quote the entire friggin' message for
> your one line blurb..??? Get with the program pal.
>
>
>
> "ron" <zypher@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:5Iudnd1Fj6-sejHYnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
People have short memories. You must have heard that phrase before no?
Forgotten perhaps? :-)
[vbcol=seagreen]
No it wasn't a hoax.
quote original message:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> ----- sitharus@4qu74xNHQeaMtN_zcpAshNZ3d1Y ----- 2007.01.14 -
> 06:12:26GMT -----
>
> From http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
>
> How NSA access was built into Windows =======================
> Duncan Campbell 04.09.1999
> Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA.
>
> A CARELESS mistake by Microsoft programmers has revealed that special
> access codes prepared by the US National Security Agency have been
> secretly built into Windows. The NSA access system is built into every
> version of the Windows operating system now in use, except early
> releases of Windows 95 (and its predecessors). The discovery comes close
> on the heels of the revelations earlier this year that another US
> software giant, Lotus, had built an NSA "help information" [local]
> trapdoor into its Notes system, and that security functions on other
> software systems had been deliberately crippled.
>
> The first discovery of the new NSA access system was made two years ago
> by British researcher Dr Nicko van Someren. But it was only a few weeks
> ago when a second researcher rediscovered the access system. With it, he
> found the evidence linking it to NSA.
>
> Computer security specialists have been aware for two years that unusual
> features are contained inside a standard Windows software "driver" used
> for security and encryption functions. The driver, called ADVAPI.DLL,
> enables and controls a range of security functions. If you use Windows,
> you will find it in the C:\Windows\system directory of your computer.
>
> ADVAPI.DLL works closely with Microsoft Internet Explorer, but will only
> run crypographic functions that the US governments allows Microsoft to
> export. That information is bad enough news, from a European point of
> view. Now, it turns out that ADVAPI will run special programmes inserted
> and controlled by NSA. As yet, no-one knows what these programmes are,
> or what they do.
>
> Dr Nicko van Someren reported at last year's Crypto 98 conference that
> he had disassembled the ADVADPI driver. He found it contained two
> different keys. One was used by Microsoft to control the cryptographic
> functions enabled in Windows, in compliance with US export regulations.
> But the reason for building in a second key, or who owned it, remained a
> mystery.
>
> A second key
> -----------
>
> Two weeks ago, a US security company came up with conclusive evidence
> that the second key belongs to NSA. Like Dr van Someren, Andrew
> Fernandez, chief scientist with Cryptonym of Morrisville, North
> Carolina, had been probing the presence and significance of the two
> keys. Then he checked the latest Service Pack release for Windows NT4,
> [extern] Service Pack 5. He found that Microsoft's developers had fail
ed
> to remove or "strip" the debugging symbols used to test this software
> before they released it. Inside the code were the labels for the two
> keys. One was called "KEY". The other was called "NSAKEY".
>
> Fernandes reported his re-discovery of the two CAPI keys, and their
> secret meaning, to "Advances in Cryptology, Crypto'99" conference held
> in Santa Barbara. According to those present at the conference, Windows
> developers attending the conference did not deny that the "NSA" key was
> built into their software. But they refused to talk about what the key
> did, or why it had been put there without users' knowledge.
>
> A third key?!
> ----------
>
> But according to two witnesses attending the conference, even
> Microsoft's top crypto programmers were astonished to learn that the
> version of ADVAPI.DLL shipping with Windows 2000 contains not two, but
> three keys. Brian LaMachia, head of CAPI development at Microsoft was
> "stunned" to learn of these discoveries, by outsiders. The latest
> discovery by Dr van Someren is based on advanced search methods which
> test and report on the "entropy" of programming code.
>
> Within the Microsoft organisation, access to Windows source code is said
> to be highly compartmentalized, making it easy for modifications to be
> inserted without the knowledge of even the respective product managers.
>
> Researchers are divided about whether the NSA key could be intended to
> let US government users of Windows run classified cryptosystems on their
> machines or whether it is intended to open up anyone's and everyone's
> Windows computer to intelligence gathering techniques deployed by NSA's
> burgeoning corps of "information warriors".
>
> According to Fernandez of Cryptonym, the result of having the secret key
> inside your Windows operating system "is that it is tremendously easier
> for the NSA to load unauthorized security services on all copies of
> Microsoft Windows, and once these security services are loaded, they can
> effectively compromise your entire operating system". The NSA key is
> contained inside all versions of Windows from Windows 95 OSR2 onwards.
>
> "For non-American IT managers relying on Windows NT to operate highly
> secure data centres, this find is worrying", he added. "The US
> government is currently making it as difficult as possible for "strong"
> crypto to be used outside of the US. That they have also installed a
> cryptographic back-door in the world's most abundant operating system
> should send a strong message to foreign IT managers".
>
> "How is an IT manager to feel when they learn that in every copy of
> Windows sold, Microsoft has a 'back door' for NSA - making it orders of
> magnitude easier for the US government to access your computer?" he
> asked.
>
> Can the loophole be turned round against the snoopers?
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Dr van Someren feels that the primary purpose of the NSA key inside
> Windows may be for legitimate US government use. But he says that there
> cannot be a legitimate explanation for the third key in Windows 2000
> CAPI. "It looks more fishy", he said.
>
> Fernandez believes that NSA's built-in loophole can be turned round
> against the snoopers. The NSA key inside CAPI can be replaced by your
> own key, and used to sign cryptographic security modules from overseas
> or unauthorised third parties, unapproved by Microsoft or the NSA. This
> is exactly what the US government has been trying to prevent. A
> demonstration "how to do it" program that replaces the NSA key can be
> found on Cryptonym's [extern] website.
>
> According to one leading US cryptographer, the IT world should be
> thankful that the subversion of Windows by NSA has come to light before
> the arrival of CPUs that handles encrypted instruction sets. These would
> make the type of discoveries made this month impossible. "Had the
> next-generation CPU's with encrypted instruction sets already been
> deployed, we would have never found out about NSAKEY."
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is
> unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than
> alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org for
> abuse and hashcash info.
>
>
>
This is at best very old news:
<http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB19990903S0014>
The date on this story is September 03, 1999 (11:05 AM EST).
It is at worst a hoax:
<http://www.windowsbbs.com/showthread.php?t=2519>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBRaznK1+iaVoeuMy2AQq2ag//dM9rt9dGACi1BNAVWRggH5wL+AGu/bpY
lBhnhlja7DrzRteDV3wyuJ2htK0h4tjHleR7V1gI
K3EgNFDm8Xl8U3kNbI+nt2z1
gYbvFIfSMKomQc3ZY9tX4PUE2Mb++kw8sHyMeJJ0
YXNsv+2LMLejkU7TLzEZ9zL/
sMH1RBDljuHCjyoauHbYLOjhcsUnRUxaRAnNGE7C
p9DUIaYiUN0JFQxNfI2c5U/E
MOrGm2+GuZuqOdXsPw+JRoiUZtxqGXCGumCg0JTD
ek0tFoK80zJv7RdI4orYNkYq
aLn8B3wl/Um7N+SpC7bNiN/ NA+rspHK+4v8pNTM25aRKTTqTnT6wtR9GPQo43uo
9
f1oQ1Mij4FbH3iXWFWmXyvYLRT8M8o12DJmo5mCs
51qBUS1Ml5UFya7iNuG4IIDN
PRLbSKwz1Dj2jzNTYDnSyAS7J+o0+0fhVK95VVQM
ZvZINh2GdtLJVkjwO1Oex+nL
JFkq1+jKAA5X/ Kk9PSJO5Er+ElPM3G86wvlyaWvmpKMNSGvPefTHz
ayo/PT0KkYu
8dZUdYJqtFsFzA3KR5aTg7WhqBdioW6jl8kpLNoH
Yv2SlLKGM9vTiFmgiBLppdc8
DYwTcJ0XqJPMWBe+KN9/ eTMkTFFncvCSgWPKc9ka5yP4cB5dCsqvfOyeE4r1
w7Ge
UrThjnfatOw=
=aePj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
___ _______ ___ ___ ___ __ ____
/ _ \/ __/ _ | / _ \ / _ \/ _ |/ / / / /
/ // / _// __ |/ // / / ___/ __ / /_/ / /__
/____/___/_/ |_/____/ /_/ /_/ |_\____/____/
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-17-07 12:12 PM
In article <Rfirh.690982$R63.319118@pd7urf1no>
"The Equalizer" <not@home.com> wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Jeezus christ... did you have to quote the entire friggin' message for you
r
> one line blurb..??? Get with the program pal.
>
>
>
> "ron" <zypher@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:5Iudnd1Fj6-sejHYnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
Top posting whiner.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Re: NSA reaaly does have an "in" to Windoze |
 |
 |
|
|
01-17-07 12:12 PM
Unruh wrote:
> Anonymous via Panta Rhei <anonymous@panta-rhei.eu.org> writes:
>
>
>
>
> From http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
>
>
> I assume next you will find an article from 1492 placing a further
> brick into you edifice of paranoia.
Wanna try that again in English you illiterate cuntlip?
Oh, never mind, you're a Canadian cuntlip......
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:18 AM. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
|
|
|
|
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum
|
 |
|
 |
|