-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

See
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....3e07ce8a99e66e6
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....8f534298406b1be

And it is filtering again
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....14ec4ac54f1ae80
(I take Nomen's word for this because I know nothing about PHP,
Eelbash's reply looks like a coverup to me, attacking the symptoms
instead of the cause)

So please block his IP forever and ever and ever,
Thomas
- --
War on terror will resume shortly in an evil axis country in your
vicinity - http://home.hccnet.nl/t.j.boschloo/waronterror.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iQB5AwUBRbDODAEP2l8iXKAJAQGFxQMeNSWjqdez
08tWC5T6mt+0pTo5PE7Mc3y0
 Hzq9SQ2q9Jo0n6JxGOvvIM7sEnpP0DHgQzt324kD
H9OYjh2AvXY63VbCua2ODuZR
 YKaRfwQwmcpaNcQ6tLpeYiaV02H0J8kZJjmh6A==

=4qDp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> because I know nothing ...

hey everybody, Boschloon finally said something right!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> See
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt....14ec4ac54f1ae80
> (I take Nomen's word for this because I know nothing about PHP,
> Eelbash's reply looks like a coverup to me, attacking the symptoms
> instead of the cause)

Of course "nomen" nailed it. It's obvious. Hundreds of thousands of PHP
coders pass text between scripts and other applications without the
escpae problem ever being a factor BECAUSE they're not parsing that
text. It's the only way it COULD be a factor, and the fact that it is
in this case not only outs eeltard as being up to his old tricks it
outs him as being too XXXXing STUPID to keep it a secret for a whole
week.

>
> So please block his IP forever and ever and ever,
> Thomas

Unfortunately in this specific case most remops are staunch idealists.
99.999% of the time this is a good thing. In this situation though, it
only enables eelbash's mental disorders. I'm afraid that the concept of
free speech has its side bad side effects, and this is one of them.

> - --
> War on terror will resume shortly in an evil axis country in your
> vicinity - http://home.hccnet.nl/t.j.boschloo/waronterror.html
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>  iQB5AwUBRbDODAEP2l8iXKAJAQGFxQMeNSWjqdez
08tWC5T6mt+0pTo5PE7Mc3y0
>  Hzq9SQ2q9Jo0n6JxGOvvIM7sEnpP0DHgQzt324kD
H9OYjh2AvXY63VbCua2ODuZR
>  YKaRfwQwmcpaNcQ6tLpeYiaV02H0J8kZJjmh6A==

> =4qDp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

nobody@mixmaster.it wrote in message news:
< 6ff82268d1d103e6d802a9c2ce241c2b@mixmast
er.it> ...
> Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
> 
>
> Of course "nomen" nailed it. It's obvious. Hundreds of thousands of PHP
> coders pass text between scripts and other applications without the
> escpae problem ever being a factor BECAUSE they're not parsing that
> text. It's the only way it COULD be a factor

It is not the only way it could be a factor, it's obvious you have not
done much coding in PHP.

Eel: stripslashes();

/steve
--
Packetderm, LLC
Web hosting, SSH Tunneling, Proxies, Advanced E-Mail, Privacy
http://www.cotse.net/areyoureadyforus.html

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:09:35 -0500, Steve wrote:

>
> Eel: stripslashes();

Thanks, that's a good one to know. I just looked it up at
http://ca.php.net/stripslashes, and it looks like an on-the-fly way to
cure the escape characters problem.

What I finally found out as a solution was to change the magic_quotes_gbc
parameter in the php.ini file to 'off'. That fixed the problem, but if it
turns out that the backslash is needed sometimes, and it probably will
turn out that way if I ever do more than rudimentary php coding, the
stripslashes will be useful.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Steve wrote:

> nobody@mixmaster.it wrote in message news:
> < 6ff82268d1d103e6d802a9c2ce241c2b@mixmast
er.it> ... 
>
> It is not the only way it could be a factor, it's obvious you have
> not done much coding in PHP.

In this case it absolutely is. It's obvious you don't understand the
problem. 

>
> Eel: stripslashes();
>
> /steve

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, "Non scrivetemi"
<nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
 
>
>In this case it absolutely is. It's obvious you don't understand the
>problem. 

here's that same XXXXing XXXXXXX of a moron, insisting once again that his
shitbrained paranoid ideas are superior to the facts.

It is very instructive that the biggest bashers of Eel have both now openly
and repeatedly proven themselves to be XXXXing thick-skulled morons without
the capacity to learn a technical fact, even when it's put right in their
faces for them.

This particular immature moron is one XXXXing stupid piece of lowlife
idiot... and he's been daily spewing anti-Eel drivel for months and months
and months. You XXXXXXX, you make Eel look good by comparison. But you go
ahead and carry on with your shitbrained postings, you XXXXing idiot of a
moron.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G.
(Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
admin@firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.linux.it or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.


>This particular immature moron is one XXXXing stupid piece of
lowlife
>idiot... and he's been daily spewing anti-Eel drivel for months and
months
>and months. You XXXXXXX, you make Eel look good by comparison. But
you go
>ahead and carry on with your shitbrained postings, you XXXXing
idiot of a
>moron.

Is that you, Jim Bob?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <45b0ce29$0$30632$e4fe514c@dreader12.news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> So please block his IP forever and ever and ever,

Why?

Look, eelbash should never ever run an actual remailer again. A
remailer is part of a network and as he insists on running his
completely differently to everyone else it causes anonymity problems.

But this is not a remailer. It's a web script that people choose to
use to post through remailers. I have no idea why anyone would want to
do that because the entire point of remailers is that nobody has the
plain text until the final hop, but some people like the convenience
of these web based forms and don't care.

Would you really rather he return to running a remailer, or would you
prefer that he spend his time working on things that can't hurt anybody?

Let him do his thing. At least now he's providing something that some
people might actually have a use for.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Nomen Nescio wrote:

> In article <45b0ce29$0$30632$e4fe514c@dreader12.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote: 
>
> Why?

For his own good. Eelbash has a disease. He's irrationally obsessed
with fondling anonymous mail. And just like a caring family members
keep drunks away from situations where they might be exposed to booze,
we his friends need to help Eelbash manage his addiction. It's a tough
love thing.


Are you that cruel? Don't you want him to get better?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]