 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
In article <45ec3e76$0$22923$ed362ca5@nr2.newsreader.com>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> This help file is published periodically.
It was last 'published' less than 8 full days ago.
What's the point of spamming us?
How about posting to alt.privacy.anon-server.stats
instead? That's the group people look at if they
want information about remailers.
Or...how about posting it once every couple of
months?
> 011-44-8700-686454
What is this? It's been brought up by quite a few
people over the weeks, and you've never explained.
It looks exactly like the spam-filter-dodging stuff
added to the end of posts by spammers to try and
avoid getting picked up by duplicate post filters.
It's quite weird.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
> In article <45ec3e76$0$22923$ed362ca5@nr2.newsreader.com>
> Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> It was last 'published' less than 8 full days ago.
> What's the point of spamming us?
Since the Panta admin, one of our most esteemed remailer operators, posts
the same kind of information every 7 days, I figured it was ok if other
people did it as well. What do you think?
>
> How about posting to alt.privacy.anon-server.stats
> instead? That's the group people look at if they
> want information about remailers.
It sounds like the group that people look at if they want *stats* about
remailers.
>
> Or...how about posting it once every couple of
> months?
I'll be happy to accede to the consensus of the responsible members of
this group, as long as it applies to everyone who posts here.
>
>
> What is this? It's been brought up by quite a few
> people over the weeks, and you've never explained.
>
> It looks exactly like the spam-filter-dodging stuff
> added to the end of posts by spammers to try and
> avoid getting picked up by duplicate post filters.
Since the entire post is a duplicate, and since the numbers you refer to
don't change from week to week, how can it be a spam-dodging gimmick?
And how can a legitimate message, not asking for money, and on-topic
for the group, posted once a week, possibly be considered spam?
If you can figure out what it is, it will do you some good; it might even
get you to give up your inferior culture for one that is superior.
>
> It's quite weird.
So are your complaints.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF7JBCnCWE8SEbcIsRArJiAKDFrDsGJuzm
HYci7uqvKrhuDV22YgCeJNcw
ANgv0SfJmsxRk8iQc0s31go=
=ZeMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Newsanon Admin wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
[snip][vbcol=seagreen]
[snip][vbcol=seagreen]
> If you can figure out what it is, it will do you some good; it might even
> get you to give up your inferior culture for one that is superior.
I would love being superior! But I fear it might involve being like you :-(
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBReyYowEP2l8iXKAJAQF9TQMgs/hN+tZHm/zPkhhB5O360VzVpibaKrJ6
G+6B3beFBJkHCqKiyXPlEVfqGvtHTZIkxesKDlbW
kCsn+LWJHh3JbpTXlL93qfDf
n15SJczV11PIMK592Dz19tVd3GpcPAOQ1tY5XA==
=MtKS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anonyma wrote:
> In article <45ec3e76$0$22923$ed362ca5@nr2.newsreader.com>
> Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
[snip]
>
> What is this?
It is a phone number in England. 011 is the extension to call from
America. I suggest someone dial it and find out who answers. It is
custom to answer with the digits of the number you just called so you
need to trick this guy. Something about having catched a remailer abuser
or knowing the true identity of Boschloo would probably do the trick.
Eelbash Admin has many triggers.
hi,
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBReybqQEP2l8iXKAJAQHYWQMdEt5unxRI
1OBtFUXpRYPD+uK8TQp0/03q
XNsO25XzNqWOGDjp9cdGx3L7GgrdioE5oY953QrL
JPuti1f3n5v3O5xRzyVnyBLE
/xlo99uhL/In2fnlkE4PQGgvA0xppRDrtXvw6g==
=oS3l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
> Since the Panta admin, one of our most esteemed remailer operators, posts
> the same kind of information every 7 days, I figured it was ok if other
> people did it as well. What do you think?
Where?! I haven't seen *any* post from Panta admin, including
automated posts, in this group for months.
>
> I'll be happy to accede to the consensus of the responsible members of
> this group, as long as it applies to everyone who posts here.
Well you gave one example of a remop posting every 7 days (which I
personally don't see on my server). There are 30 or so remops. Even
if Panta does post here and my server mysteriously deletes them, it
seems to be the consensus of other remops not to do it.
But it's typical of you to pick out one example and ignore the majority.
> Since the entire post is a duplicate, and since the numbers you refer to
> don't change from week to week, how can it be a spam-dodging gimmick?
I don't think he was suggesting you were using the numbers as a spam
dodging gimmick, but rather that the only time anyone sees such
numbers on a post is from spammers. That was probably why he, and
others, have asked what they are. Because they seem meaningless
*because* your post doesn't need a spam dodging gimmick.
> If you can figure out what it is, it will do you some good; it might even
> get you to give up your inferior culture for one that is superior.
Is this the whole "Chinese people are superior to every other race"
crap you insist on spouting every now and then?
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:08:48 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
> Where?! I haven't seen *any* post from Panta admin, including
> automated posts, in this group for months.
See an automated post of his from feb 26. The previous one is from feb 12.
His name is in the subject. It looks like he's switched to a two-week
schedule, so I'll do the same.
By the way, this has nothing to do with Panta except that I take his
posts here to be examples of what is acceptable. Rather than go against
the norm, it makes sense to me to follow a good example, that being
Panta's.
>
> But it's typical of you to pick out one example and ignore the majority.
It is? You just made that up, didn't you?
>
> Is this the whole "Chinese people are superior to every other race"
> crap you insist on spouting every now and then?
Is it? You just made that up, didn't you?
Superior Anonymous Services: http://eelbash.yi.org:8080/info/
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-07 12:13 AM
Newsanon Admin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
>
>
> Since the Panta admin, one of our most esteemed remailer operators,
> posts the same kind of information every 7 days, I figured it was ok
> if other people did it as well. What do you think?
I think you're not Panta Admin, and comparing yourself to him is an
insult.
I think that you don't deserve the same respect, privileges, and
latitudes Panta Admin does because while he has worked to uphold the
principal of free speech and promote remailer usage in general, you've
done absolutely nothing but actively or inadvertently try to destroy
anonymity and the remailer network, then purposefully campaign against
the people who are anonymity's staunchest supporters when they
discarded you as a sick freak.
I think the remailer network and the privacy community in general would
be better off if you had never been born, but since we can't
retroactively correct your mother's drinking problem or her sperm
donor's genetics, we'll just continue to point out what a direct
threat you are to personal privacy, and insist that you not be allowed
to function to any degree that allows your bizarre infatuations to be
a serious problem.
And I think that to this end, everything you do or say regardless of
what pseudonyms you hide behind needs to be questioned, dissected, and
ultimately discarded.
So, is there anything else you need cleared up today?
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:09 PM. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
|
|
|
|
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum
|
 |
|
 |
|
