Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to b
e
censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?

I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
alternatives that are free would be preferred.

Useful info greatly appreciated.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:19:39 GMT, Ernst Zundholz wrote:

> Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to
 be
> censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
> preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?
>
> I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
> alternatives that are free would be preferred.
>
> Useful info greatly appreciated.

I have a link to a free one on the internet links page of our site,

Regards
--
Admin


* www.privacyoffshore.net  (No Logs Internet Surfing)
* Anonymous Secure Offshore SSH-2 Surfing Tunnels

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Ernst Zundholz <ErnstZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com>
wrote:
>Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to 
be
>censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
>preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?
>
>I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
>alternatives that are free would be preferred.
>
>Useful info greatly appreciated.

Since you have proven yourself too damn stupid to understand the
relationship between QS and individual remailers, any information provided
you would be wasted.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ernst Zundholz <ErnstZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to 
be
>censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
>preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?
>
>I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
>alternatives that are free would be preferred.
>
>Useful info greatly appreciated.

Be Nymble, Jack.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <sib6v2hgpilmvilsv946n0o73ml3fgnlrt@4ax.com>, Ernst Zundholz <Ern
stZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:

> Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to
 be
> censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
> preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?
>
> I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
> alternatives that are free would be preferred.
>
> Useful info greatly appreciated.

Use remailers with hand rolled content.

You need GPG (free), a text editor (you should have that or can get 1 for fr
ee) and an email client or use a free web mail client.

This takes a little time to master but you don't have to worry about obsolet
e or backdoored "anonymous" software. There are a lot of resources on the we
b on how to do it.

Good luck,

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ernst Zundholz <ErnstZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:

> Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to
 be
> censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
> preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?
>
> I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
> alternatives that are free would be preferred.
>
> Useful info greatly appreciated.

Why should anybody tell you? You'd only try to annoy us in alt.hacker even
more than you do now!
--
If you can't remember, then the claymore IS pointed at you.

Friß, Spammer: RjUxr@dfH3.7eggert.dyndns.org PTGxhxf@cNjXL.7eggert.dyndns.or
g
ltv7G@Oh.7eggert.dyndns.org wtvp3@bMRhdycx.7eggert.dyndns.org

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <sib6v2hgpilmvilsv946n0o73ml3fgnlrt@4ax.com>
Ernst Zundholz <ErnstZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to
 be
> censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
> preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?
>
> I am prepared to pay a small monthly amount, if absolutely necessary, but
> alternatives that are free would be preferred.
>
> Useful info greatly appreciated.

You forgot that TOR has been compromised because the lead
programmer, George W. Bush, didn't send in enough canadians.

I use the postal service.

Think about it, have they caught the anthrax mailer yet?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <sib6v2hgpilmvilsv946n0o73ml3fgnlrt@4ax.com>
Ernst Zundholz <ErnstZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> Since QS seems to permanently out of service, and aioe and datemas seem to
 be
> censoring psotings to newsgroups, can readers kindly recommend a good,
> preferably FREE method of posting anonymously to newsgroups?

QS works just fine. If you're not seeing any of your posts arrive,
then you are probably having one of the following problems:

1. You are using a stats source that isn't updated or is unreliable.
Try www.noreply.org/allpingers/ to choose another one. Banana's stats
are very reliable.

2. The news service you read from is filtering out all remailer posts.
If this happens, your posts will still arrive but you won't see them.
Check another news source like Google or one of the many free news
servers.

3. You are using the program incorrectly. Maybe you aren't formatting
your messages correctly, maybe you're using mail2news servers that no
longer exist. Show us an example.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article < dc532236456d18c2f8b2feb6c88313c0@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> Use remailers with hand rolled content.
>
> You need GPG (free), a text editor (you should have that or can get 1 for 
free) and an email client or use a free web mail client.
>
> This takes a little time to master but you don't have to worry about obsolete or b
ackdoored "anonymous" software. There are a lot of resources on the web on how to do
 it.

You'll only be using the Cpunk type I protocol then, which is much
less anonymous and secure than Mixmaster type II messages. You'll
also be in a much smaller anonymity set. Why would you want that?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ernst Zundholz wrote:
[snip]

It's a troll, people.  This is the same post he's made repeatedly.  He
doesn't care about the answer, he just wants to trick you into to
flooding alt.hacker with replies.

Please stop replying to this thread.

--
The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence
has its limits.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]