Haha, maybe the googlers can XXXX up tor even more, like they did with dejan
ews?
Between their consults with the Fed spy agencies and the screwups anti-priva
cy
drones at google, they can turn Tor into the privacy equivalent of windows
OS? I still use tor, but I am retired, I can take a 5 min. coffee break whil
e
each page loads.


traveller 66 <noreply@nym.alias.net> correctly observed:

>tor is a piece of shit. the longer palfreader and mathewson work on
>it the worse it gets. dump those assholes before your credibility is
>completely gone.
>
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:

> Haha, maybe the googlers can XXXX up tor even more, like they did with dej
anews?
> Between their consults with the Fed spy agencies and the screwups anti-pri
vacy
> drones at google, they can turn Tor into the privacy equivalent of windows
> OS? I still use tor, but I am retired, I can take a 5 min. coffee break wh
ile
> each page loads.

Sounds like someone is threatened by Tor.

Wonder who that might be....
[vbcol=seagreen]
> traveller 66 <noreply@nym.alias.net> correctly observed:
> 

At least you got one thing right. The attribution. Congratulations.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <fb50b55919390cc1766861cfa53a990d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
fritz@spamexpire-200703.rodent.frell.theremailer.net says...
>
>
>Sounds like someone is threatened by Tor.
>
>Wonder who that might be....
>
Why are so many people in these Privacy groups so ill-mannered?

TOR works fine for me. I am running newsgroups as well as Firefox under TOR
and SocksCap and things move quickly enough to suit me most of the time. Eve
n
eMule works well, but that's so slow on its own account one would never noti
ce
any difference so I don't bother with it anymore.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <77CdnejHftZ8ZGbYnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@bway.net>
Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote:
>
> Why are so many people in these Privacy groups so ill-mannered?

They're not. It's just one person who keeps trying to discredit Tor in
an attempt to get people to use their non anonymous paid service.

The rest of us real people are actually quite polite...well...most of
the time.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:23:28 -0400, Gogarty wrote:

> In article <fb50b55919390cc1766861cfa53a990d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
> fritz@spamexpire-200703.rodent.frell.theremailer.net says... 
> Why are so many people in these Privacy groups so ill-mannered?
>
> TOR works fine for me. I am running newsgroups as well as Firefox under TO
R
> and SocksCap and things move quickly enough to suit me most of the time. E
ven
> eMule works well, but that's so slow on its own account one would never no
tice
> any difference so I don't bother with it anymore.

They aren't, it's just mostly one or maybe two people who make posts and
then claim they were made by others. It's nice to have the time to do that
all day long, ain't social assistance grand.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Anonymous <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
>In article <77CdnejHftZ8ZGbYnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@bway.net>
>Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote: 
>
>They're not. It's just one person who keeps trying to discredit Tor in
>an attempt to get people to use their non anonymous paid service.

You mean they come in here and Li about TOR?  They are just mad because TOR
can be shown to be effective, where their "service" can be proven to be
ineffective, and based on a Li? ;-)

>The rest of us real people are actually quite polite...well...most of
>the time.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Traveling Eggfart #66 lied:

>  it's just mostly one or maybe two people who make posts and
> then claim they were made by others.

The only one playing those childish little games here is you, pervert,
and you've been busted on it big time at least twice now. In fact the
last one embarrassed you so much your filthy baby raping XXX can't even
bear to comment on it. Isn't that right, "Eggtard"?

"Ooops, I forgot to change socks!"

"I mean no, that wasn't me....."

<laughing>

What a moron!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

XXXX off you logging scumpuppet

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:15:11 -0400 (EDT), Anonyma wrote:

> Traveling Eggfart #66 lied:
> 
>
> The only one playing those childish little games here is you, pervert,
> and you've been busted on it big time at least twice now. In fact the
> last one embarrassed you so much your filthy baby raping XXX can't even
> bear to comment on it. Isn't that right, "Eggtard"?
>
> "Ooops, I forgot to change socks!"
>
> "I mean no, that wasn't me....."
>
> <laughing>
>
> What a moron!

Trying to paint someone¢s label on me just shows what a puppet you are, it
was easier to kill file you when you weren't posting here with the
re-mailers. Your non stop support for cotse and the extreme you've taken it
to leaves allot to be desired for. Re-mailer or not your still the same
troll/puppet who isn't doing cotse any service. The only person who would
carry on here the way you have is either the owner of a service or one of
his help desk minions, or an absolutely twisted up troll, which one of each
you are I don't know. I do know that your technical knowledge seems to be
above what most internet users or techs would consider average. Go back
under that rock you crawled out of and play somewhere else, like on the
highway.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

pervert #66 wrote:

> Trying to paint someone's label on me

<flush>

Nobody painted anything on you asslicker. You're an admitted pedophile.
By your own words. No wonder you hide behind so many nyms. Even your
lying travellerpuppet persona is embarrassed about your perverted
eggfart bullshit.

You're such a lowlife even YOU don't want to associate with you.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]