Is anyone out there using ethernet extenders that support 802.1q to support 
a phone and pc?

Care to share some experiences?

We're looking at providing service to some outlying areas and our option is 
an analog phone -or- an ethernet extender. The cost of the few extenders we 
would have to purchase would likely outweigh the cost of the one vg224 we wo
uld have to buy, so cost at this point is not an issue - especially because 
of the extra service, i.e. data. These users would have had to use dialup ov
er the analog line for their data. yuck.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

If possible, I would suggest using two pairs of extenders.  Use one pair
for voice and another for data.  That would at least keep them separated
and help out from an administrative point of view.



From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:51 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC

 

Is anyone out there using ethernet extenders that support 802.1q to
support a phone and pc?

 

Care to share some experiences?

 

We're looking at providing service to some outlying areas and our option
is an analog phone-or- an ethernet extender. The cost of the few
extenders we would have to purchase would likely outweigh the cost of
the one vg224 we would have to buy, so cost at this point is not an
issue - especially because of the extra service, i.e. data. These users
would have hadto use dialup over the analog line for their data. yuck.

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  Ifyou are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

now, _that_ would be cost prohibitive - basically doubling the cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Matt Slaga (US) 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC


If possible, I would suggest using two pairs of extenders.  Use one pair for
 voice and another for data.  That would at least keep them separated and he
lp out from an administrative point of view.

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck
.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:51 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC

 

Is anyone out there using ethernet extenders that support 802.1q to support 
a phone and pc?

 

Care to share some experiences?

 

We're looking at providing service to some outlying areas and our option is 
an analog phone -or- an ethernet extender. The cost of the few extenders we 
would have to purchase would likely outweigh the cost of the one vg224 we wo
uld have to buy, so cost at this point is not an issue - especially because 
of the extra service, i.e. data. These users would have had to use dialup ov
er the analog line for their data. yuck.

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confid
ential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee
(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby 
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use
 or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and ma
y be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti
fy us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your comp
uter. Thank you. 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Perhaps not.  It would eliminate the need for 802.1q  supporting
extenders which should cut the costs quite a bit.  How many users are
you trying to support?  I am assuming a small office/10-15 users?

 

 

 

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:02 PM
To: Matt Slaga (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC

 

now, _that_ would be cost prohibitive - basically doubling the cost.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

	----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Matt Slaga (US) <mailto:Matt.Slaga@us.didata.com>  

	To: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca>  ;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 

	Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:57 PM

	Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone
w/ PC

	 

	If possible, I would suggest using two pairs of extenders.  Use
one pair for voice and another for data.  That would at least keep them
separated and help out from an administrative point of view.

	 

	From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
	Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:51 PM
	To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
	Subject: [cisco-voip] ethernetextenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/
PC

	 

	Is anyone out there using ethernet extenders that support 802.1q
to support a phone and pc?

	 

	Care to share some experiences?

	 

	We're looking at providing service to some outlying areas and
our option is an analog phone -or- an ethernet extender. The cost of the
few extenders we would have to purchase would likely outweigh the cost
of the one vg224 we would have to buy, so cost atthis point is not an
issue - especially because of the extra service,i.e. data. These users
would have had to use dialup over the analog line for their data. yuck.

	 

	 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
	Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
	Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1
	(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
	
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
	....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

________________________________

	Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or
its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thankyou. 



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have receivedthis communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying tothis message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ah - I see what you mean. These would be for small offices of 1 or two peopl
e each. I'll have to spec out the cost. I saw a couple of Pattons for 700 bu
cks list for the pair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Matt Slaga (US) 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC


Perhaps not.  It would eliminate the need for 802.1q  supporting extenders w
hich should cut the costs quite a bit.  How many users are you trying to sup
port?  I am assuming a small office/10-15 users?

 

 

 

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:02 PM
To: Matt Slaga (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC

 

now, _that_ would be cost prohibitive - basically doubling the cost.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Matt Slaga (US) 

To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 

Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:57 PM

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC

 

If possible, I would suggest using two pairs of extenders.  Use one pair for
 voice and another for data.  That would at least keep them separated and he
lp out from an administrative point of view.

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck
.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 4:51 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ethernet extenders + 802.1q + ip phone w/ PC

 

Is anyone out there using ethernet extenders that support 802.1q to support 
a phone and pc?

 

Care to share some experiences?

 

We're looking at providing service to some outlying areas and our option is 
an analog phone -or- an ethernet extender. The cost of the few extenders we 
would have to purchase would likely outweigh the cost of the one vg224 we wo
uld have to buy, so cost at this point is not an issue - especially because 
of the extra service, i.e. data. These users would have had to use dialup ov
er the analog line for their data. yuck.

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confid
ential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee
(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby 
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use
 or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and ma
y be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti
fy us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your comp
uter. Thank you. 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confid
ential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee
(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby 
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use
 or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and ma
y be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti
fy us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your comp
uter. Thank you. 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]