On Mar 29, 11:29 am, "markm75" <markm...@msn.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 5:59 am, Arno Wagner <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Apologies.. Yeah when bypassing the cache I got an index of 57MB/s...- Hid
e quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If I use the option, checked off, "Bypass windows cache" I do in fact
get HIGHER values than when not bypassing the cache..

I know this sounds reversed, but it is what happens.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]