[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...ls:all-tabpanel ]

Graham Dumpleton closed MODPYTHON-112.
--------------------------------------


> If using filters value of req.phase only valid up till first req.read()/re
q.write().
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>                 Key: MODPYTHON-112
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-112
>             Project: mod_python
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.4, 3.2.7
>            Reporter: Graham Dumpleton
>         Assigned To: Graham Dumpleton
>             Fix For: 3.3
>
>         Attachments: grahamd_20060223_1.diff
>
>
> The request object provides a member variable called 'phase' described as:
>   The phase currently being being processed, e.g. "PythonHandler". (Read-O
nly)
> If no Python based input and output filters are used, the value of req.pha
se will be constant for the life of a request phase. If however you use an i
nput or output filter, the value of req.phase can change.
> Consider that we are in the content handler phase and where there is a Python base
d output filter, but no Python based input filter. On initially entering the request
 handler, the value of req.phase will be "PythonHandler". As soon as req.write() is 
cal
led however, the value of req.phase changes to "PythonOutputFilter".
> Now, if there is a Python based input filter, but no Python based output f
ilter, the value of req.phase will change to "PythonInputFilter" as soon as 
req.read() is called.
> If there are both Python based input and output filters, the value of req.
phase will in turn change to "PythonInputFilter" and "PythonOutputFilter" as
 req.read() and then req.write() are in turn called.
> The reason for all this is that in the get_request_object() function of sr
c/mod_python.c, it contains code:
>     /* make a note of which phase we are in right now */
>     Py_XDECREF(request_obj->phase);
>     if (phase)
>         request_obj->phase = PyString_FromString(phase);
>     else
>         request_obj->phase = PyString_FromString("");
> That is, whenever called to get the request object, it will update req.phase. This
 will occur even if the request object had already been created, as will be the case
 when there is a Python based content handler and either a Python based input or out
put
filter.
> Overall this behaviour is a bit strange and unexpected. It would seem to me that i
t if there is both a handler and a filter, that the value of req.phase would be left
 as the name of the handler phase. Ie., it would stay for example as "PythonHandler"
 an
d not be changed to "PythonInputFilter" or "PythonOutFilter".
> One can't just change the code in get_request_object() not to update it if
 already set, as it has to be updated when one moves from one phase to anoth
er. One has to contend with where this function is called in python_filter()
 function, namely:
>     /* create/acquire request object */
>     request_obj = get_request_object(req, interp_name,
>                                      is_input?"PythonInputFilter":"PythonO
utputFilter");
> First step may be simply not to pass in "PythonInputFilter" or "PythonOutp
utFilter" and instead just call it as:
>     request_obj = get_request_object(req, interp_name,0);
> At the same time change get_request_object() to:
>     Py_XDECREF(request_obj->phase);
>     if (phase)
>         request_obj->phase = PyString_FromString(phase);
>     else if (!request_obj->phase)
>         request_obj->phase = PyString_FromString("");
> Ie., result will be that if req.phase is set, leave it alone when called b
y python_filter() with phase set 0. If req.phase isn't already set, set it t
o the empty string.
> The consequences of this are that if there are filters but no Python based handler
s, then req.phase will get set to an empty string in that case. Another strange case
 is that if the only Python based handler was for an early phase than what is consum
ing
or generating the content to be processed, then req.phase will be set to a v
alue corresponding to that earlier phase and not where the current action is
. For example, if there was an AccessHandler but then content came from a st
atic file, output filter w
ould see "AccessHandler".
> Thus, whatever is done, there will be some strangeness. Thus, question remains of 
what should be done, or if it should be left that way and that documentation changed
 to say that req.phase is only valid up until first call to req.read() or req.write(
) w
ithin a handler.
> This is not an ideal situation though as a handler may want to interogate req.phas
e after req.read() or req.write() has been called for some reason, which would yield
 incorrect results if a filter is being used. An example of where this occurs is in 
err
or reporting in the HandlerDispatch of mod_python.apache itself. When it is 
generating an error message, the phase shown in the error message will be wr
ong if there was a filter. It should perhaps at least be changed to save awa
y req.phase at start of dis
patch so it knows it is correct later for any error messages.
> Any comments?????

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]