"* Max 300 minutes per week of free calls, measured over the last 7 days and
per unique IP address."
This doesn't make any sense to me.
Surely they would monitor this on a per account basis.
What am I missing here?

--
Graham.
%Profound_observation%

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Apr 11, 8:41 pm, "Graham" <m...@privacy.com> wrote:
> "* Max 300 minutes per week of free calls, measured over the last 7 days a
nd
> per unique IP address."
> This doesn't make any sense to me.
> Surely they would monitor this on a per account basis.
> What am I missing here?
>
> --
> Graham.
> %Profound_observation%

Well, it's been like that for quite some time

- hence the issues with Voxalot, which sound like they're well on the
way to being resolved now

It does seem an odd way  to set up a fair use policy though, as the
people actually abusing Betamax might be a bit more agile

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"andy" <andy.ggrps@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1176321277.678140.89780@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 11, 8:41 pm, "Graham" <m...@privacy.com> wrote: 
>
> Well, it's been like that for quite some time
>
> - hence the issues with Voxalot, which sound like they're well on the
> way to being resolved now
>
> It does seem an odd way  to set up a fair use policy though, as the
> people actually abusing Betamax might be a bit more agile

Although I originally summised that the Voxalot block was to do with the
unique IP address, I am not so sure now.  Anyway whatever it is, it should
all be solved in two shakes of a lamb's tail (US servers do not seem to have
the problem, though)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Herman" <whhitehousemadhouse-2005@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:TnbTh.3015$Sc4.515@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
> "andy" <andy.ggrps@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:1176321277.678140.89780@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... 
>
> Although I originally summised that the Voxalot block was to do with the
> unique IP address, I am not so sure now.  Anyway whatever it is, it should
> all be solved in two shakes of a lamb's tail (US servers do not seem to
> have the problem, though)

So are you saying it's got nothing to do with the 300 min/week
and nothing to do with dynamic vs. static IP addresses (as I thought)?
It's more to do with it not working at all unless your IP was consistent
source to destination.

I did toy with the idea of networking two
Asterisk boxes across the internet, I suppose if I did I wouldn't
be able to access Betamax lines from the remote site.

I did do some tests with voxalot on Monday and found of
their three clusters only the European one seemed to have any issues.

--

Graham.
%Profound_observation%

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]