04-14-07 12:11 PM
On Apr 14, 12:38 am, alexd <troffa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>
> I've not used it myself - is it any good?
Seems a bit buggy at the moment, and without some of the freepbx
functionality.
>
> I'm bound to think that any GUI that tries to capture the functionality of
> Asterisk's text config files - which is practically a programming language
> in itself - is going to be a disappointment on some level.
>
Think I'll stick with Freepbx at this end!
>
> Also, are the local users who can dial 1571 dialling 9 first, perchance? H
ow
> are you routing the call? @default doesn't look right. For example [va
nilla
> Asterisk], in my sip.conf, my Sipgate context is called 'sipgate' and my
> voip.co.uk context is called 'voipcouk'. And to use the Sipgate trunk, I
> dial 89 then the number. So if I 8910000, the leading 89 gets stripped off
,
> and Asterisk says:
>
> Executing Dial("SIP/6012-00637c30", "SIP/10000@sipgate|60|tr") in new stac
k
>
> Dial 9 for voip.co.uk trunk, 9 gets stripped off:
>
> Executing Dial("SIP/6012-00637c30", "SIP/08000850643@voipcouk|60|o") in ne
w
> stack
>
> So your dial requests should look like 1571@voipfone, or whatever your
> Voipfone trunk context is. You should be able to see what it's doing by
> opening an Asterisk and making sure the verbosity is at least 3 ['set
> verbose 3'].
>
Thats what I thought. All the local users can dial out without any
problems, without a 9.
The settings for the trunks are so simplistic in the gui though.....
When I get a chance I'll sit and have another watch of the cli...
Cheers
Matthew
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|