admin@eelbash.yi.org wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:11:44 -0600, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> 
> remix klen100"; 
>
> On the contrary, I like mixmaster and would prefer to run the remailer
> using it, but I do not know of a command-line way to get mixmaster to
> decrypt a message. Rather, I don't know of a way, running a python
> script, to tell mixmaster to decrypt a message.

What, for the love of Buddha, are you babbling about?

Mixmaster decrypts every single message it's *suppose* to decrypt
automatically. If you're trying to get it decrypt anything beyond that
routinely you're XXXXing around where you shouldn't... again. There's
absolutely no justifiable reason what so ever for doing this.

Finding out you're molesting a remailer again is no surprise, but
thanks for letting us know anyway. Anyone who routes traffic through
anything you have your grubby hands on is a fool, regardless of how
"secure" the software you're running is suppose to be.

> Do you happen to know of a command to do the job? You're making these
> snotty remarks; perhaps instead you can contribute something useful.

Getting Mixmaster to manually decrypt messages is trivial, you just
have to know where to "look" for them. 

No, I'm not going to help you be a remailer deviate.
 
> you) but 
>
> See above. I'm running a Python script - the script *is* the remailer;
> and I can send out mixmaster messages; but decrypting them isn't
> possible, it seems.

If your broken code doesn't en/decrypt messages it's *not* a remailer,
it's a wrapper for a working remailer. Why you have the urge to do
something like this can only be guessed at, although given your
colorful history those guesses will probably be pretty damned accurate.

> Quicksilver and Reliable call mixmaster and decrypt messages, but I'm
> beginning to think it involves some complex API and isn't possible with
> a relatively simple command line. I find it hard to believe that the
> people who wrote mixmaster would have written it that way, but there

You find it hard to believe competent coders wouldn't anticipate your
bizarre obsession with other people's mail and provide you with an even
*easier* way to snoop than they already have?

Sorry about your luck there kiddo, but you just proved once again what
a miserable cunt you really are. You not only think it's OK to XXXX up
remailer software, you think that software's developers are incompetent
for not holding your hand through the process.

> isn't a whisper of a decrypt command in the online manual, nor could I
> find anything using a search engine.

Like XXXX there isn't you illiterate bastard.

> I wish SofaKing was around; I bet he could write a Python script that
> could do some super-complex call to mixmaster. That's the kind of guy we
> need here writing nitty-gritty applications.

That way you'd have something more to steal and break, huh?

XXXXXXX.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]