admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

> Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote: 
>
> Your question is actually a serious one and reasonably courteous.
> Amazing for this group. Thank you for such unusually civil behaviour.

Calling what you're doing "XXXXing around", incomprehensible, and
senseless is what you consider "playing nice"?

Or are you smokin' wiener trying to get someone to fix things for you?

> The answer is that I tried for two weeks to configure mixmaster as a
> remailer in linux but failed. It sent out dribs and drabs of messages,

ROTFLMAO!

Two weeks and you STILL couldn't figure it out??

Dude! I started from a clean drive and had Debian/Postfix/Mixmaster up
and running in 20 XXXXing MINUTES the first time I set it up a Linux
Remailer. Seriously. No lie. SSL/TLS and the whole shebang.

Aren't you suppose to be superior or something? LOL!

> but for the most part they just sat in the pool and when, now and then,
> a few did get written out of the pool, they, for the most part,
> disappeared. I tried three different smtp servers to no avail. The
> behaviour of the thing was and is inexplicable to me.
>
> I finally decided to try writing a remailer in Python, partly as a way
> to run a remailer in Linux, since I have jettisoned Windows, and partly
> for the challenge of doing it.
>
> I'm well aware that, even if it incorporated the decryption of mixmaster
> messages, it wouldn't approach the existing mixmaster remailer; but we
> all do our mite for anonymity, and this is what I'm able to do.

You misspelled "NOT able to do".

LOL!!!!


> 
>
> A few years ago I had never run linux, only windows and, as far as I
> could tell, having used it for some years, mixmaster running under
> windows was not a remailer. Are you now telling me that mixmaster
> running under windows is a remailer in addition to being a
> decryption/encryption program? Amazing!
>
> 
>
> Yeah, I've read the online manual, configured
> /var/lib/mixmaster/mix/mix.cfg, /etc/mixmaster, templates, generated
> keys, the whole nine yards. I know it's a remailer (under linux).
>
> I would like to see evidence for your contention, if it is your
> contention, that mixmaster under windows is a remailer. I hate to think

What evidence? It's the same God damned program!

> I ran Reliable all those years when I could have run mixmaster under
> windows as a remailer; but if that's the case, I have to live with it.

Mixmaster works just fine as a remailer under Winblows you dumbXXXX, you
just have to be able to tie it to a MTA and there aren't that many
decent ones for Winblows.
 
>
> I hope I have answered your question satisfactorily.

You haven't answered them at all. What the XXXX does Mixmaster being a
PITA under Winblows have to do with you dicking around with useless
scripts under Linux?

>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]