 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
 |
 |
|
|
04-23-07 06:11 PM
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any expectations from
cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the form of a SR4e
could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix is in
ES100 from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general and wait for
a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na <http://www.dimensiondata.com/na>
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 supportcontact
the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-23-07 06:11 PM
My understanding from TAC was no more SR's for 4.1.3. Upgrade to ES 100
or go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any expectations from
cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the form of a SR4e
could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix is in
ES100 from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general and wait for
a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 support contact
the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-23-07 06:11 PM
Since 4.1 has not been EOL'ed how can they not make any more SRs for it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott
To: Jason Aarons (US) ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no more SR's for 4.1.3. Upgrade to ES 100 or
go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck
.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any expectations from cisc
o on when a rollup with everything needed in the form of a SR4e could arrive
?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix is in ES100
from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general and wait for a SR, but
how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 support contact the
Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confid
ential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee
(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use
or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and ma
y be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti
fy us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your comp
uter. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-24-07 12:11 AM
Is 4.0 EOS/EOL?
I haven't seen any SR since Dec 05.
Scott
________________________________
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:10 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Since 4.1 has not been EOL'ed how can they not make any more SRs for it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
To: Jason Aarons (US) <mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com> ;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no more SR's for 4.1.3. Upgrade
to ES 100 or go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any
expectations from cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the
form of a SR4e could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix
is in ES100 from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general and
wait for a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with
ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 support
contact the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or
its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
________________________________
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-24-07 12:11 AM
...interesting.
I guess as long as they provide a fix, that's all that's important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Jason Aarons (US) ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Is 4.0 EOS/EOL?
I haven't seen any SR since Dec 05.
Scott
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:10 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Since 4.1 has not been EOL'ed how can they not make any more SRs for it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
..there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott
To: Jason Aarons (US) ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no more SR's for 4.1.3. Upgrade to ES 100 or
go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck
.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any expectations from cisc
o on when a rollup with everything needed in the form of a SR4e could arrive
?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix is in ES100
from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general and wait for a SR, but
how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 support contact the
Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confid
ential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee
(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use
or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and ma
y be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti
fy us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your comp
uter. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-24-07 12:11 AM
Maybe the DST 2007 Field Notices should have recommended customers
upgrade to 4.2, 4.3 or 5.1 path versus applying the updates in the Field
Notices. They would have saved some labor if the below is true.
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:07 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no moreSR's for 4.1.3. Upgrade to ES 100
or go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any expectations from
cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the form of a SR4e
could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix is in
ES100 from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general and wait for
a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 support contact
the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receivedthis
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replyingto this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-24-07 12:11 AM
Applying a ES isn't the preferred fix due to lack of regression testing,
etc.
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:17 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
...interesting.
I guess as long as they provide a fix, that's all that's important.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca> ; Jason Aarons
(US) <mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com> ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Is 4.0 EOS/EOL?
Ihaven't seen any SR since Dec 05.
Scott
________________________________
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:10 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Since 4.1 has not been EOL'ed how can they not make any more SRs
for it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as abad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
To: Jason Aarons (US)
<mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com> ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no more SR's for 4.1.3.
Upgrade to ES 100 or go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any
expectations from cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the
form of a SR4e could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098.
The fix is in ES100 from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general
and wait for a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go
ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7
support contact the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any
attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is
for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not
the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this
email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank
you.
________________________________
______________________________________
_________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for useby the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you havereceived this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-24-07 12:11 AM
If it makes you feel any better......... I'm running ES 100 =(
________________________________
From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:20 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Voll, Scott; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Applying a ES isn't the preferred fix due to lack of regression testing,
etc.
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:17 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
...interesting.
I guess as long as they provide a fix, that's all that's important.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca> ; Jason Aarons
(US) <mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com> ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Is 4.0 EOS/EOL?
I haven't seen any SR since Dec 05.
Scott
________________________________
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:10 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Since 4.1 has not been EOL'ed how can they not make any more SRs
for it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
To: Jason Aarons (US)
<mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com> ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no more SR's for 4.1.3.
Upgrade to ES 100 or go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=)
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any
expectations from cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the
form of a SR4e could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098.
The fix is in ES100 from Cisco. I'd prefer to hold off on ESs in general
and wait for a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go
ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7
support contact the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any
attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is
for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not
the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this
email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank
you.
________________________________
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e? |
|
|
|
|
04-24-07 12:11 AM
Last I heard there were some debates going on over whether there =
would be an SR5 for 4.1(3). Before the DST issues there were no =
plans for another SR but those appear to have changed. Currently FCS =
for SR5 should be in June.
-Ryan
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Voll, Scott wrote:
If it makes you feel any better=85=85=85 I=92m running ES 100 =3D(
From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:jason.aarons@us.didata.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:20 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Voll, Scott; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Applying a ES isn=92t the preferred fix due to lack of regression =
testing, etc.
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:17 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
...interesting.
I guess as long as they provide a fix, that's all that's important.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ =
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Jason Aarons (US) ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Is 4.0 EOS/EOL?
I haven=92t seen any SR since Dec 05.
Scott
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:10 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Since 4.1 has not been EOL'ed how can they not make any more SRs for it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ =
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Voll, Scott
To: Jason Aarons (US) ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
My understanding from TAC was no more SR=92s for 4.1.3. Upgrade to ES =
100 or go the way of either 4.2, 4.3, or 5.1.
=3D)
Scott
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- =
bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:01 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Timeframe for a 4.1(3)SR4e?
Seems there are a several caveats around DST2007, any expectations =
from cisco on when a rollup with everything needed in the form of a =
SR4e could arrive?
For 7971s every site is hitting CSCsg81459, CSCsg22098. The fix is =
in ES100 from Cisco. I=92d prefer to hold off on ESs in general and =
wait for a SR, but how long until SR4e?
Should I bother waiting for the next 4.1(3) SR or go ahead with ES100?
Jason Aarons
Consultant
http://www.dimensiondata.com/na
904-338-3245 cell
For urgent issues notify your Project Manager, for 24x7 support =
contact the Dimension Data NOC at 800-974-6584.
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain =
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the =
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended =
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this =
communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email =
or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you =
have received this communication in error, please notify us =
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your =
computer. Thank you.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain =
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the =
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended =
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this =
communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email =
or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you =
have received this communication in error, please notify us =
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your =
computer. Thank you.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 PM. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
|
|
|
|
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum
|
 |
|
 |
|
