Hey Guys,

This is probably related to the previous
LS "Paint" scenario I described, but
I thought I'd mention it, in case
it uses a different refresh sequence.

I tried copying a syntaxChecker entry
from the syntaxCheckers under "apachemeta"
to "system".

ADS does not allow the operation, but the
copied entry is still painted.

Here is the error message:

Error while copying entry
[LDAP: error code 80 - failed to add entry
m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1,ou=syntaxCheckers,cn=sys
tem,ou=schema:
SyntaxChecker with OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
already registered!]
[LDAP: error code 80 - failed to add entry
m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1,ou=syntaxCheckers,cn=sys
tem,ou=schema:
SyntaxChecker with OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
already registered!]

Also I can delete the copied entry
(That does not really exist)
and there are no error messages.

Cheers,
- Ole

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ole Ersoy a écrit :

> Hey Guys,
>
> This is probably related to the previous
> LS "Paint" scenario I described, but
> I thought I'd mention it, in case
> it uses a different refresh sequence.
>
> I tried copying a syntaxChecker entry
> from the syntaxCheckers under "apachemeta"
> to "system".
>
> ADS does not allow the operation, but the
> copied entry is still painted.
>
> Here is the error message:
>
> Error while copying entry
> [LDAP: error code 80 - failed to add entry
> m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1,ou=syntaxCheckers,cn=s
ystem,ou=schema:
> SyntaxChecker with OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
> already registered!]
>   [LDAP: error code 80 - failed to add entry
> m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1,ou=syntaxCheckers,cn=s
ystem,ou=schema:
> SyntaxChecker with OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
> already registered!]
>
> Also I can delete the copied entry
> (That does not really exist)
> and there are no error messages.
>
> Cheers,
> - Ole
>
>
Can you feel a JIRA, please?

Thanks
Emmanuel.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Emmanuel,

Sure - I'll just add this additional info
to the JIRA I had for copy and paste between
partitions, or maybe we should do a new one.

Actually I'll do a new one because
there is a subtle difference between
this behavior and the behavior that
occurs with copy and paste between partitions.

When I copied and pasted between partitions,
ADS said "Ah ahhh", but LS still painted
the entry.  Upon a refresh, the entry was
removed from LS.

In this case, the entry is not removed from LS
during a refresh, and I can delete it without
any error message.  Normally I would think that
if the entry is not there, but shows up in LS,
some sort of exception would be thrown...like
a "Entry not present exception" or something.

OK - JIRA here I come.

Cheers,
- Ole



Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Ole Ersoy a écrit :
> 
> Can you feel a JIRA, please?
>
> Thanks
> Emmanuel.
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]