Unsigned cop files on Cisco downloads page

So, I have an ATA problem, so, I decide to download new code, but the file
is unsigned...

WTF?

Seriously, do they just assume that people are not running CCM 5.1 out
there?

Jonathan

Anything non-cop lists specifically it is for CM versions earlier
than 5.0(4).   There is a good argument to have them removed (or
moved to the archive) since nobody in their right mind will be
running anything earlier than 5.0(4) these days (only masochists will
be running 5.0 anything to be honest).

-Ryan

On Apr 28, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:

So, I have an ATA problem, so, I decide to download new code, but the
file is unsigned...

WTF?

Seriously, do they just assume that people are not running CCM 5.1
out there?

Jonathan
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Yeah, we noticed a similar problem with the 5.1.1b file... it wasn't signed,
which makes sense for a 5.0 upgrade to 5.1.1b, but if you were like some of
us, who had 5.1.1a (and wanted your QOS to work), you couldn't upgrade
because it wasn't signed...

Jonathan

On 4/30/07, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Anything non-cop lists specifically it is for CM versions earlier
> than 5.0(4).   There is a good argument to have them removed (or
> moved to the archive) since nobody in their right mind will be
> running anything earlier than 5.0(4) these days (only masochists will
> be running 5.0 anything to be honest).
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Apr 28, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
> So, I have an ATA problem, so, I decide to download new code, but the
> file is unsigned...
>
> WTF?
>
> Seriously, do they just assume that people are not running CCM 5.1
> out there?
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

I just want to say thanks to all those brave souls who have been running
5.1 so that all the bugs will be worked out when I upgrade.THANKS!!!!!!!

Scott

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:34 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff
Cc: ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unsigned cop files on cisco downloads page

Yeah, we noticed a similar problem with the 5.1.1b file... it wasn't
signed, which makes sense for a 5.0 upgrade to 5.1.1b, but if you were
like some of us, who had 5.1.1a (and wanted your QOS to work), you
couldn't upgrade because it wasn't signed... 

Jonathan

On 4/30/07, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff@cisco.com> wrote:

Anything non-cop lists specifically it is for CM versions earlier
than 5.0(4).   There is a good argument to have them removed (or
moved to the archive) since nobody in their right mind will be
running anything earlier than 5.0(4) these days (only masochists will
be running 5.0 anything to be honest).

-Ryan

On Apr 28, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:

So, I have an ATA problem, so, I decide to download new code, but the 
file is unsigned...

WTF?

Seriously, do they just assume that people are not running CCM 5.1
out there?

Jonathan
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip