04-30-07 06:11 PM
Hey Guys,
This just came across the wire
on the junit mailing list:
http://gtcgroup.com/soaj/Road.to.SOAj.html#AMT
It looks like a phenomenal start at automated
method testing work that I mentioned a while
back, in conjunction with the "Class + Class Helper"
pattern, which we also discussed on the JUnit mailing list here
for those interested:
http://www.nabble.com/100---Method-...85.htm
l
Here is brief excerpt from their documentation (Which has very
impressive depth):
========================================
================================
You want to be advantaged by Test Driven Development (TDD) techniques in
a cost-effective manner.
Effective application design includes the notion of “testability”. The
“Automated Method Test” pattern provides an alternative to custom
hand-coded unit tests for a subset of functional methods. Authoring
hard-coded tests leads to several representative challenges:
· Volume - The volume of test code can exceed the volume of
functional code.
· Effort – The effort expended on test code can exceed the
effort expended on functional code.
· Cost - The long-term cost of servicing test code can exceed
the cost expended on functional code.
========================================
================================
Might be worth it for us to keep a close eye on this.
Cheers,
- Ole
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|