Re: Standard for X-Reproxy-Service?
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > Perlbal > Re: Standard for X-Reproxy-Service?




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Re: Standard for X-Reproxy-Service?  
Brad Fitzpatrick


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
05-03-07 06:11 AM

David,

Perlbal already advertises its capabilities to downstream web servers.

- Brad


On Wed, 2 May 2007, David Weekly wrote:

> Brad,
>
> Helpful! It seems this header doesn't make a lot of sense for other
> reproxies, then.
>
> It seems to me that it could be helpful for a reverse proxy to be able
> to announce its capabilities to a downstream application server. That
> way an off-the-shelf install of a web service could take advantage of
> services like reproxying if available.
>
> (Or is that silly, since reproxy availability oughtn't be a "per
> connection" issue and therefore more properly belongs as an
> application server config setting?)
>
> Just a thought. Thanks again for the clarification.
>
> -David
>
>
> On 5/2/07, Brad Fitzpatrick <brad@danga.com> wrote: 
>
>






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register