Now that voipcheap is charging 11.5p/minute to mobiles it can no
longer be regarded as cheap. So, what is the cheapest now that,
preferably, will work with Voxalot?
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
 news:1qd843lb6gfdsb5p79kmm7h1t9r0ovhet2@
4ax.com...
> Now that voipcheap is charging 11.5p/minute to mobiles it can no
> longer be regarded as cheap. So, what is the cheapest now that,
> preferably, will work with Voxalot?
> Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.

The site is still quoting 0.065ppm...........

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Fri, 11 May 2007 15:20:19 GMT, "Jono" <no@no.co.uk> wrote:

>
>"Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1qd843lb6gfdsb5p79kmm7h1t9r0ovhet2@
4ax.com... 
>
>The site is still quoting 0.065ppm...........
>
Oh - Yes you are right, sorry.  Confusion abounds!  I don't know
what happened there.
Does voipcheap still not work with Voxalot?

Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

It happens that Brian A formulated :
 
> Oh - Yes you are right, sorry.  Confusion abounds!  I don't know
> what happened there.
> Does voipcheap still not work with Voxalot?

.....and there I was thinking you were the Voxalot guru.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
 news:qff943h7q3nj8prdjk9440cctquvrm172s@
4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 15:20:19 GMT, "Jono" <no@no.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Oh - Yes you are right, sorry.  Confusion abounds!  I don't know
> what happened there.
> Does voipcheap still not work with Voxalot?
>
> Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.

Works OK for me.  I believe they are checking the IP address now, but not
sure.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On May 11, 8:28 pm, "Herman" <whhitehousemadhouse-2...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
> "Brian A" <no_spam_bca1...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
>  news:qff943h7q3nj8prdjk9440cctquvrm172s@
4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Works OK for me.  I believe they are checking the IP address now, but not
> sure.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The Betamax blocking issues were sorted out a while back.

It has been working mostly ok, but some people were still having a
couple of Betamax fair use policy type issues with for example Voxalot
web callback

This has been resolved by Voxalot - "... the web callback feature now
passes the IP address of the browser that initiated the call.

This enables Betamax to manage their FUP for all calls made through
Voxalot. "

http://forum.voxalot.com/voxalot-su...3.html#post8765

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 11 May 2007 12:58:06 -0700, andy <andy.ggrps@googlemail.com> wrote:

>On May 11, 8:28 pm, "Herman" <whhitehousemadhouse-2...@yahoo.co.uk>
>wrote: 
>
>The Betamax blocking issues were sorted out a while back.
>
>It has been working mostly ok, but some people were still having a
>couple of Betamax fair use policy type issues with for example Voxalot
>web callback
>
>This has been resolved by Voxalot - "... the web callback feature now
>passes the IP address of the browser that initiated the call.
>
>This enables Betamax to manage their FUP for all calls made through
>Voxalot. "
>
>http://forum.voxalot.com/voxalot-su...
.html#post8765
Thanks for the info. and, yes, Jono, I do use Voxalot and I read the
forums but there have been differing reports and, not having a
voipcheap account, I wasn't able to test this for myself. Some people
were saying that the US server was OK but the Europe one wasn't.  Web
callback is something I thought of trying with voipcheap, I don't want
to put on some credit and find it doesn't work. I have had callback
working with other operators and it works well. Even when they start
to charge for callback it will only be about £6/year I think.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]