traveller 66 wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:50:19 +0200, Pi wrote:
> 
[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
> This must be the retard that calls everyone what he is, projection I think
> it's called, and he has a bag full. I wonder if he wants a free ride in a
> police, car picked up right from his door.

I suppose for whatever reason I'm one of the few who thinks you're not
an Adminus sockpuppet. I think you're just a guy who fell in with the
wrong crowd.
Please, I'm begging you, dump this XXXXXXX. I can't see any possible way
you could have any faith in privacy.li anymore. Even leaving any
criminal aspects aside, the sheer incompetence and lack of understanding
of the most BASIC privacy and security concepts and practises exhibited
by prili's admin should send anybody running away full speed. They don't
even understand how Tor works!

It's time. You can do it. nobody will hold it against you.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:57:34 -0600, joe wrote:

> I suppose traveller 66 for whatever reason I'm one of the few who thinks y
ou're not
> an Adminus sockpuppet. I think you're just a guy who fell in with the
> wrong crowd.
> Please, I'm begging you, dump this XXXXXXX. I can't see any possible way
> you could have any faith in privacy.li anymore. Even leaving any
> criminal aspects aside, the sheer incompetence and lack of understanding
> of the most BASIC privacy and security concepts and practises exhibited
> by prili's admin should send anybody running away full speed. They don't
> even understand how Tor works!
>
> It's time. You can do it. nobody will hold it against you.

You might be right, I had decent conversation, not entirely illuminating
mind you, but decent with 66 but as the ole saying goes.

Lay down with Adminus, get up with XXXXing fleas.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

joe wrote:

> traveller 66 wrote: 
> 
>
> I suppose for whatever reason I'm one of the few who thinks you're not
> an Adminus sockpuppet. I think you're just a guy who fell in with the
> wrong crowd.

I don' think it's possible for it be more than one person. No living thing
could be so stupid that it would still defend privacy.LIE after all the
ugly, incompetent, hateful bullshit that's been uncovered about them in
the last couple years.

The guy is a confessed pedophile anyway so who cares? Whether you lump his
pedophile XXX in with Adem or not he's still not worth anything. Let him
stay with his own kind. I don't WANT the disgusting pervert on my side.

> Please, I'm begging you, dump this XXXXXXX. I can't see any possible way
> you could have any faith in privacy.li anymore. Even leaving any
> criminal aspects aside, the sheer incompetence and lack of understanding
> of the most BASIC privacy and security concepts and practises exhibited
> by prili's admin should send anybody running away full speed. They don't
> even understand how Tor works!
>
> It's time. You can do it. nobody will hold it against you.

Speak for yourself. The pervert will never find peace now no matter what
he says or does. He borked that up a very, very long time ago. It's too
late.

It is nice to see he's finally getting some of the official recognition he
deserves though. A netkook award should look real good hanging on his wall
next to the fake "Doctor" certificate. ;-)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 22 Jun 2007 00:39:59 +0200, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:

> joe wrote:
> 
>
> I don' think it's possible for it be more than one person. No living thing
> could be so stupid that it would still defend privacy.LIE after all the
> ugly, incompetent, hateful bullshit that's been uncovered about them in
> the last couple years.
>
> The guy is a confessed pedophile anyway so who cares? Whether you lump his
> pedophile XXX in with Adem or not he's still not worth anything. Let him
> stay with his own kind. I don't WANT the disgusting pervert on my side.
> 
>
> Speak for yourself. The pervert will never find peace now no matter what
> he says or does. He borked that up a very, very long time ago. It's too
> late.
>
> It is nice to see he's finally getting some of the official recognition he
> deserves though. A netkook award should look real good hanging on his wall
> next to the fake "Doctor" certificate. ;-)

I can just picture the walls in your house COOK. It's to bad that people
like you that flame, try to set up others and puppet their life away in
usenet have to do it here.

Flush

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

traveller 66 wrote:

> On 22 Jun 2007 00:39:59 +0200, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> 
>
> I can just picture the walls in your house COOK.

How'd you know I do most of the cooking? You been peeking through my
windows at night you rascally little pervert?

All my kids are raised and out on their own, pervert. Nothing to see
here. Move along.

You might try my oldest son's house. He has a 9 year old boy.

Mind the shotgun, though. <snicker>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:45:30 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell wrote:

> traveller 66 wrote:
> 
>
> How'd you know I do most of the cooking? You been peeking through my
> windows at night you rascally little pervert?
>
> All my kids are raised and out on their own, pervert. Nothing to see
> here. Move along.
>
> You might try my oldest son's house. He has a 9 year old boy.
>
> Mind the shotgun, though. <snicker>

My mistake on the spelling, I meant KOOK.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

traveller 66 wrote:

> My mistake on the spelling

Well there's some XXXXing news.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]