Patrick,

Winter is shared with Pobox?

Sheesh!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sheesh! wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Winter is shared with Pobox?
>
> Sheesh!
>
The winters remailer sits on a different machine than pobox.  However
since I run both of them, I assume they are considered family.

Patrick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFGkaEHMYIXomaKpd8RAtpVAJ4mWWq8+uI2
qoofmfnElfM33NPHGQCfYdrv
ziXAuRPLKQeq3zBVIp45KWQ=
=mFB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

marlowe <marlowe@antagonism.org> wrote:

>The winters remailer sits on a different machine than pobox.  However
>since I run both of them, I assume they are considered family.

Does Mixmaster respect such associations when selecting random chains?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:

> marlowe <marlowe@antagonism.org> wrote:
> 
>
> Does Mixmaster respect such associations when selecting random chains?

I don't think so, so in my starex.txt file I put all but one remailer
of such a group.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:

>Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
> 
>
>I don't think so, so in my starex.txt file I put all but one remailer
>of such a group.

I honestly pay tribute to every remailer admin for her marvelous
service. But what's the justification for such a mumbo-jumbo then?
Don't we need more indepentent remailer operators in additional
countries rather than more remailers per se?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]