What do you think of this tor wrapper?

http://janusvm.peertech.org/

Has anyone tried it? Pros? Cons? Caveats?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Jul 13, 12:25 am, Anonymous Sender
<anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
> What do you think of this tor wrapper?
>
> http://janusvm.peertech.org/
>
> Has anyone tried it? Pros? Cons? Caveats?

http://janusvm.peertech.org/Flash/J...SEC-Demo-1.html

This is the only tool that prevents side channel attacks against Tor.
This happens because JanusVM is transparently proxying ALL your TCP
traffic through Tor.

HD Moore had a very nice example of why you should NOT trust your
applications to always use Tor correctly.  JanusVM doesn't have this
problem because it catches everything at the Network Layer.

Also, I am going to be releasing a 0-day against Tor @ DefCon15 this
year that will reveal your true IP address. :-P
Needless to say, the 0-day will not work against those using
JanusVM.
And no, I'm not releasing ANY details about it until Defcon.

Enjoy!

Kyle

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <1184316321.217249.171350@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Goldy <kyle.kwilliams@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 13, 12:25 am, Anonymous Sender
> <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote: 
>
> http://janusvm.peertech.org/Flash/J...SEC-Demo-1.html
>
> This is the only tool that prevents side channel attacks against Tor.
> This happens because JanusVM is transparently proxying ALL your TCP
> traffic through Tor.
>
> HD Moore had a very nice example of why you should NOT trust your
> applications to always use Tor correctly.  JanusVM doesn't have this
> problem because it catches everything at the Network Layer.
>
> Also, I am going to be releasing a 0-day against Tor @ DefCon15 this
> year that will reveal your true IP address. :-P
> Needless to say, the 0-day will not work against those using
> JanusVM.
> And no, I'm not releasing ANY details about it until Defcon.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Kyle

That is very interesting.

How much memory would be required to run VMPlayer and JanusVM optimally unde
r Windows?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <1184316321.217249.171350@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Goldy <kyle.kwilliams@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 13, 12:25 am, Anonymous Sender
> <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote: 
>
> http://janusvm.peertech.org/Flash/J...SEC-Demo-1.html
>
> This is the only tool that prevents side channel attacks against Tor.
> This happens because JanusVM is transparently proxying ALL your TCP
> traffic through Tor.
>
> HD Moore had a very nice example of why you should NOT trust your
> applications to always use Tor correctly.  JanusVM doesn't have this
> problem because it catches everything at the Network Layer.
>
> Also, I am going to be releasing a 0-day against Tor @ DefCon15 this
> year that will reveal your true IP address. :-P
> Needless to say, the 0-day will not work against those using
> JanusVM.
> And no, I'm not releasing ANY details about it until Defcon.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Kyle

That is very interesting.

How much memory would be required to run VMPlayer and JanusVM optimally unde
r Windows?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]