[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12513769 ]

Craig Russell commented on JDO-403:
-----------------------------------

I notice that @ForeignKey, @Index, and @Unique use String [ ] fields() w
hereas @Embedded uses Field[ ] fields() as an element.

Should these be different, now that we have added String name() to @Field? S
eems they should be consistent.

@Index(fields={
"field1",
"field2",
"field3"})

versus

@Index(fields={
@Field("field1"),
@Field("field2"),
@Field("field3")})

I guess it doesn't matter too much. There isn't any extra information needed
 from the field for Index, Unique, and ForeignKey...

> JDO2 Annotations
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: api2
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
>            Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>            Assignee: Michelle Caisse
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
>         Attachments: annotations.patch, api2_property_table.patch, embedde
d.patch, jdo_2_1_annotations.jar, tck2a.patch, tck2b.patch
>
>
> It would be desirable for JDO2 to have its own set of annotations. We have
 developed a set within JPOX that would likely serve as a starting point for
 such a set. In my opinion they should be
> 1. Split into javax.jdo.annotations.jdo and javax.jdo.annotations.orm
> 2. Move ORM attributes from some of the JDO annotations and have a ORM annotation.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]