Hi Craig,

> And fields() has type String[ ]. Now that we have the ability to put
> a name into Property and Field, should we change String[ ] fields()
> default { }

When specifying an index/unique with fields (or properties) would anyone=20
specify more than just the field names? The field itself is defined elsewhe=
re=20
and they only need give a reference to it. Think that was the reason I used


=2D-=20
Andy =A0(Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]