I'm about to install a CCME environment for an office
that handles a lot of emergency situations. My hope is
that when this office's connection to the CCM cluster
in the region that all CCME functions will take over
and this office can retain its full functionality. Is
this possible or am I supposed to configure SRST for
all of this extra functionality normally available
during WAN outages?

Paul



 ________________________________________
____________________________________
________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! Fare
Chase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/...00807e0566.html

I found my answers here.



 ________________________________________
____________________________________
________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all t
he tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

take a look closely at the requirements of using CME as SRST. i don't like
the restrictions, so we went with pure SRST if you can call it that.

in particular, the extra configuration steps, plus the difference in total
number of supported phones during the WAN outage. it might give you more
features, but we're hoping that there won't be so many WAN outages.

I believe it costs a bit more too.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Choi" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can CCME be used for SRST purposes?


> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/...00807e0566.html
>
> I found my answers here.
>
>
>
>  ________________________________________
__________________________________
__________
> Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all
> the tools to get online.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

My understanding is that it costs the same but you
will get a max of 240 phone fallback instead of 900+.
I will have to read this document carefully to make
sure we're not barking up the wrong tree.

--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> take a look closely at the requirements of using CME
> as SRST. i don't like
> the restrictions, so we went with pure SRST if you
> can call it that.
>
> in particular, the extra configuration steps, plus
> the difference in total
> number of supported phones during the WAN outage. it
> might give you more
> features, but we're hoping that there won't be so
> many WAN outages.
>
> I believe it costs a bit more too.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Choi" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
> To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can CCME be used for SRST
> purposes?
>
> 
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/...00807e0566.html 
>
 ________________________________________
 ________________________________________
____ 
> Small Business gives you all 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>
>




 ________________________________________
____________________________________
________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. 
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Cisco has something called CME in fallback mode which I tried but
struggled with some features so where I need SRST I now use SRST and
where it is standalone CME I use CME. However - I get the feeling they
might roll it into one product otherwhise why would they start talking
about cme in fallback mode etc. Might be a good thing to consolidate
because currently it is a nightmare getting the right files / images
etc on a router and not as simple as it can be.


Erik erasmus

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 5:57 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can CCME be used for SRST purposes?

My understanding is that it costs the same but you
will get a max of 240 phone fallback instead of 900+.
I will have to read this document carefully to make
sure we're not barking up the wrong tree.

--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> take a look closely at the requirements of using CME
> as SRST. i don't like
> the restrictions, so we went with pure SRST if you
> can call it that.
>
> in particular, the extra configuration steps, plus
> the difference in total
> number of supported phones during the WAN outage. it
> might give you more
> features, but we're hoping that there won't be so
> many WAN outages.
>
> I believe it costs a bit more too.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Choi" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
> To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can CCME be used for SRST
> purposes?
>
> 
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/...ps4625/products
 _configuration_guide_chapter09186a00807e
0566.html 
>
 ________________________________________
______________________________
______________ 
> Small Business gives you all 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>
>




 ________________________________________
______________________________
______________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who
knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]