Hi Craig,

> Given that we had fieldType and fieldTypes in @Field and @Property,
> and type and types in @Element, @Key, and @Value, I made them
> consistent by changing types to boundTypes in @Element, @Key, and
> @Value.
>
> Is this what we want? Or should we change boundTypes back to types
> for all four annotation types?

"boundTypes" does absolutely nothing for me. I don't see what is wrong=20
with "types" and "fieldTypes", and that is, after all, what the XML has.


=2D-=20
Andy =A0(Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]