[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12516151 ]

Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-487:
------------------------------------

This was raised in JPOX JIRA 1yr+ ago to add support for newInstance on abst
ract classes, which it has never supported.
http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-2792

> Pm.newInstance() fails when the parameter is an abstract class
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-487
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tck2
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>         Environment: jpox SNAPSHOT
>            Reporter: Michelle Caisse
>            Assignee: Andy Jefferson
>
> org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.NewInstance fails attempting to 
instantiate an abstract class.  This test is just a stub of a future test (s
ee JDO-453).  To reproduce, run
>       maven -Djdo.tck.cfglist=pm.conf runtck.jdori
>  [java] 1) testNewInstance(org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.N
ewInstance)javax.jdo.JDOUserException: java.lang.InstantiationException
>   [java]      at org.jpox.enhancer.ImplementationCreatorImpl.newInstan
ce(ImplementationCreatorImpl.java:153)
>   [java]      at org.jpox.ObjectManagerImpl.newInstance(ObjectManagerI
mpl.java:3073)
>   [java]      at org.jpox.AbstractPersistenceManager.newInstance(Abstr
actPersistenceManager.java:1413)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.NewInstance
. runTestNewInstanceAbstractClass(NewInsta
nce.java:91)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.NewInstance
.testNewInstance(NewInstance.java:65)
>   [java]      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native M
ethod)
>   [java]      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMet
hodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>   [java]      at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Deleg
atingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.JDO_Test.runBare(JDO_Test.java:254
)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.doRun(BatchTe
stRunner.java:108)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.start(BatchTe
stRunner.java:148)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.main(BatchTes
tRunner.java:123)
>   [java] NestedThrowablesStackTrace:
>   [java] java.lang.InstantiationException
>   [java]      at sun.reflect. InstantiationExceptionConstructorAccesso
r
Impl. newInstance(InstantiationExceptionConstr
uctorAccessorImpl.java:30)
>   [java]      at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor
.java:494)
>   [java]      at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:350)
>   [java]      at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:303)
>   [java]      at org.jpox.enhancer.ImplementationCreatorImpl.newInstan
ce(ImplementationCreatorImpl.java:123)
>   [java]      at org.jpox.ObjectManagerImpl.newInstance(ObjectManagerI
mpl.java:3073)
>   [java]      at org.jpox.AbstractPersistenceManager.newInstance(Abstr
actPersistenceManager.java:1413)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.NewInstance
. runTestNewInstanceAbstractClass(NewInsta
nce.java:91)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.NewInstance
.testNewInstance(NewInstance.java:65)
>   [java]      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native M
ethod)
>   [java]      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMet
hodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>   [java]      at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Deleg
atingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.JDO_Test.runBare(JDO_Test.java:254
)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.doRun(BatchTe
stRunner.java:108)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.start(BatchTe
stRunner.java:148)
>   [java]      at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.main(BatchTestRunner.
java:123)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]