[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Craig,

I see the same results when running runtck.jdori in tck2:
Total tests run: 1393. Failures: 6, Errors: 2.
6 of 79 configurations failed.

I get one more failure in tck2-legacy:
Total tests run: 1377. Failures: 7, Errors: 2.
7 of 63 configurations failed.

The signature test fails because of changes in JDOHelper, JDOHelperImpl
and PersistenceManagerFactory. I think the configuration file
jdo-2_0-signatures.txt needs to be updated. Maybe we should rename it to
jdo-2_1-signatures.txt (in both projects tck2 and tck2-legacy). We can
use issue JDO-341 for this work.

Regards Michael


> I just ran runtck.jdori and have the result:
>     [java] Total tests run: 1393. Failures: 6, Errors: 2.
>     [java] 6 of 79 configurations failed.
>
> d    [java] RUN VariableInResult.testMultipleProjection     FAILURE
> JDO-435
> a    [java] RUN VariableInResult.testMultipleProjection     FAILURE
> JDO-435
> d    [java] RUN StateTransitions.test       FAILURE JDO-455
> d    [java] RUN StateTransitionsReturnedObjects.test        FAILURE
> JDO-455
> a    [java] RUN StateTransitions.test       FAILURE JDO-455
> a    [java] RUN StateTransitionsReturnedObjects.test        FAILURE
> JDO-455
> d    [java] RUN NewInstance.testNewInstance         ERROR JDO-453
> a    [java] RUN NewInstance.testNewInstance         ERROR JDO-453
>
> So all failures/errors are known issues.
>
> I'll publish the latest spec once I've updated it with the annotations
> (almost complete).
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>


--
Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH  Tel.: +49/(0)30/235 520-33
Buelowstr. 66                Fax.: +49/(0)30/217 520-12
10783 Berlin                 mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de

Geschaeftsfuehrung: Anna-Kristin Proefrock
Sitz Berlin, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 564 52

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]