Anyone in the UK confirm if sipgate registration gateways are down *again*?

Been logging error messages since last night, and there still going strong
this afternoon.


Ta

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

It happens that Q formulated :
> Anyone in the UK confirm if sipgate registration gateways are down *again*
?
>
> Been logging error messages since last night, and there still going strong
> this afternoon.
>
>
> Ta

I can cofirm that everything appears to be working fine for me. As it
has done for yonks.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.93a67d78d5296d6f.48968@blueyonder.invalid...
> It happens that Q formulated : 
>
> I can cofirm that everything appears to be working fine for me. As it has
> done for yonks.

Hmm...

Aug 18 15:26:16 NOTICE[16004]: chan_sip.c:5372 sip_reg_timeout:    --
Registration for '99xxxx@sipgate.co.uk' timed out, trying again (Attempt
#147)
-- parse_srv: SRV mapped to host sipgate.co.uk, port 5060
Aug 18 15:26:36 NOTICE[16004]: chan_sip.c:5372 sip_reg_timeout:    --
Registration for '35xxxxx@sipgate.co.uk' timed out, trying again (Attempt
#148)

And that's all I've been getting since last night. I go up and it was on
attempt 1700 the pbx has been relaunched to see if that would help, but
nothing, and my routes to sipgate are fine (as is the webpage etc) tried
using sipgate.de, but that failed as well.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Q" <..@..> wrote in message
news:46c6f667$0$13925$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
> Anyone in the UK confirm if sipgate registration gateways are down
> *again*?
>
> Been logging error messages since last night, and there still going strong
> this afternoon.
>
>
> Ta
>

All fine here out in Sunny Cyprus.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Q wrote:
> Anyone in the UK confirm if sipgate registration gateways are down
> *again*?
>
> Been logging error messages since last night, and there still going
> strong this afternoon.
>
>
> Ta


No problems here.


--
Items for sale: http://www.dodgy-dealer.co.uk
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/MetricNow
http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/dyna/...archives_en.cfm

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx_spam@trapped__hotmail.co.u
k> wrote in message
news:xLExi.9040$cw7.4390@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>Q wrote: 
>
>
> No problems here.
>
<Cut>

Thanks.

[root@muffin ~]# telnet sipgate.co.uk 5060 (217.10.79.23)
Trying 217.10.79.23...
telnet: connect to address 217.10.79.23: Connection refused
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Back up again.

Although the test message at 10000 is the German one again...

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Q" <..@..> wrote in message
news:46c6f667$0$13925$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
> Anyone in the UK confirm if sipgate registration gateways are down
> *again*?
>
> Been logging error messages since last night, and there still going strong
> this afternoon.
>
>
> Ta
>


Hi,


I wonder if they have clusters or have implemented separate sections in
their VoIP registration servers. E.g. customers 10000->20000 routed to
server A; customers 20000->30000 routed to server B; and hence customers can
have different experiences (e.g. one down whilst another remains up)?


Best wishes,



News Reader

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Q wrote:

> [root@muffin ~]# telnet sipgate.co.uk 5060 (217.10.79.23)
> Trying 217.10.79.23...
> telnet: connect to address 217.10.79.23: Connection refused
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused

Asterisk can't do SIP over TCP anyway so that test is irrelevant.
Try 'nc -u' next time ;-)

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
21:19:26 up 32 days,  3:04,  3 users,  load average: 1.16, 1.00, 0.82
09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

News Reader wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if they have clusters or have implemented separate sections in
> their VoIP registration servers. E.g. customers 10000->20000 routed to
> server A; customers 20000->30000 routed to server B; and hence customers c
an
> have different experiences (e.g. one down whilst another remains up)?
>
Sounds plausable, It's probably been more than a year sinc eI've had a
registration failure with them.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]