On Aug 18, 11:19 am, David Taylor <davidt-n...@yadt.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2007-08-18, Andrew Crane <ne...@inweb.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> No, the question I asked was "Why, other than being an irritating twat,
> DID YOU SNIP THE PART OF THE POST WHERE THAT WAS EXPLAINED TO YOU?".
> If you were offering a different side to the discussion, you could perhaps
> try addressing the points being discussed!
> 
>
> There is nothing wrong with having a different point of view from me.
> However, if you express your view in a troll-like manner, you will not
> get much respect from me.
> 
> 
>
> Tourists?
> 
> 
>
> I'm not obsessed by the formatting of London numbers (some people might
> be).  I merely have a problem with people who attempt to claim 0207 xxx...
> is somehow "as good as" 020 7xxx.  The code _is_ 020, it _should_ be
> written as 020, for good reasons.  I fully accept that formatting it
> wrongly will not cause problems _most of the time_, but since it's
> relatively easy to put the space in the right place, I'm suggesting
> it's the best idea...
>
> --
> David Taylor- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Is it not strange that those of us who insist on correct number
formatting are considered pedants?  When, our accuser, who constantly
instists on incorrect and confusing formatting considers himself
"normal".  We do, indeed, live in intersting times.

Adrian

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]